Question

When Carter ran for reelection, he won.
A. True
B. False

Answer 1

Ronald Mcdonald *cough* Reagan came along.

Answer 2

Carter was about as worthless as Lincoln. Thank god he wasn't re elected. OOPS Did I say that?

Answer 3

so false? XD

Answer 4

Lincoln was a good president!

Answer 5

And then it's false.

Answer 6

LINCOLN WAS AWESOME!

Answer 7

Best president of the US, hands down.

Answer 8

yankee is a bad person #InstaBanPlease

Answer 9

I beg very much to differ. He violated Dixie's constitutional rights!!!

Answer 10

So what!? he ended SLAVERY!

Answer 11

He also put the US back together when it broke.

Answer 12

^^

Answer 13

And he was a reasonable, fair president.

Answer 14

Reagan takes the name of best president.
Wait a minute. I need to get you a quote. Just a second.

Answer 15

Now, his successor is as worthless as Carter. That guy undid everything he did.

Answer 16

Reagan is definitely up there for best president's of the US.

Answer 17

OMG A QUOTE? Do you guys think JFK was a good president?

Answer 18

Barring saving us from the flying nukes o doom, no.

Answer 19

In a letter to Horace Greeley he said "If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that."
Meaning, his whole anti-slavery thing was for popularity. He was a tyrant!

Answer 20

...

Answer 21

He got results. It worked.

Answer 22

He freed the slaves. He came through with his word.

Answer 23

Lincoln was not really a tyrant.

Answer 24

When Carter ran for reelection, he won.
A. True
B. False

Answer 25

You mind answering that while we're on the topic? XD

Answer 26

No, he did not win. Because Ronald McDonald *cough* Reagan came along.

Answer 27

OH FAIL

Answer 28

I se eu did

Answer 29

I got caught up in this lincoln mess xd

Answer 30

Just like FDR had the New Deal, what was Reagan’s plan called?
A. Great Society
B. Reagan Revolution
C. The Great Frontier
D. Reagan's Way

Answer 31

The Reagan Revolution.

Answer 32

Anyway. Yankee. Even if you meant that, he got results. Fixed up the country and was a great president!

Answer 33

What was “trickle- down” economics?
A. Economics based on the idea that economic freedom helps create wealth that then goes down to all levels of society.

B. Economics based on the idea that the federal government need to give poor people welfare, public housing, free food.
C. Economics based on the idea that all property and income should be publically owned with everyone getting an equal share.

Answer 34

Just to ask. What did Reagan do for the country
?

Answer 35

What didn't he do?

Answer 36

Took every single bad thing and corrected it.

Answer 37

XD

Answer 38

Or at least did better than most.

Answer 39

I think the answer would be A or C

Answer 40

He had the Russians cowering in fear!
And he kept Jelly beans on his desk!!!!!!

Lincoln violated the constitutional rights of the South when he ATTACKED them for succeeding.
Quote from a confederate address
"All we demand of other peoples is, to be let alone, to work out our own high destinies"
Besides, most confederates didn't even own slaves. And union folks owned just as many!

Answer 41

Actually, the South shot first. Lincoln said that he wanted to maintain a Union outpost, then the South just attacked it.

Answer 42

Also, the South could not actually leave the US because they didn't do it formally. So technically, he was within his rights. And the Confederates did own slaves. It's how they got by on their plantations.

Answer 43

Yankee got rekt by Surana. GG

Answer 44

Red Team is Victorious! SUCK IT BLUES!

Answer 45

That outpost, For Sumter, was South of the dixon line, meaning it was in confederate territory. How would any other country react if we just said 'We're making a fort here, or occupying against your will. Get over it." Try that in Russia and see who fires.

Answer 46

Blue team fires back with a threat of "You ain't going no where!"

Answer 47

You do realize that Fort Sumter was in Union territory. Muchinso we have embassies, Sumter was still Union territory. So it was an attack on Union territory, Lincoln responded as such.

Answer 48

Of course the plantation owners had slaves. But your average, everyday man didn't. Once again, the poor and middle class are being summed up by a few crooked rich plantation owners.

Answer 49

Oh snap it's history throw down!

Answer 50

There were a lot of plantation owners in the south.

Answer 51

I'm sorry. If The unions kept buying and using all the slaves. Why did they VOTE to END SLAVERY? Tell me that.

Answer 52

Like really. You make the unions seem bad.

Answer 53

Yeah, because voting to end slavery is such an evil.

Answer 54

It's like not wanting to kill the terrorist because he's got feelings.

Answer 55

And he makes good cookies.

Answer 56

And watches Modern Family in his spare time.

Answer 57

Even though he's got a gun pointed at your best friend in the whole wide world.

Answer 58

Lincoln made it VERY CLEAR that he had NO intention of letting us succeed! What would you do? They were being forced to stay with something they didn't agree with!


The Union was crooked. They took the South's tax money and left them in the dust. They used the money the Southerners were making to make their own cities more advanced.
I'm not a racist. But here's the thing; The war was NOT about slavery. It was about state's rights! Slavery was part of it, yes, but it was mostly about the unfair taxes and the fact that the south had no say-so!

Answer 59

And the Union won. Says a lot for the south.

Answer 60

OH SNAP! Surana with the come back! Yankee come on!

Answer 61

Also could you answer this @Surana What was “trickle- down” economics?
A. Economics based on the idea that economic freedom helps create wealth that then goes down to all levels of society.

B. Economics based on the idea that the federal government need to give poor people welfare, public housing, free food.
C. Economics based on the idea that all property and income should be publically owned with everyone getting an equal share.

Answer 62

T-D-E was basically the first one.

Answer 63

Didn't feel like writing it out.

Answer 64

Huh?

Answer 65

Trickle-Down-Economics = First answer.

Answer 66

Oh ty

Answer 67

(No, I don't agree with slavery, btw.)
Of course! They were FARMERS trying to lead their own life. The Union had money and thousands of extra men! Sure, things were tight, but seriously? And established army against a few men just trying to protect their heritage? Of course it's a good chance they'll lose! A miracle like the revolutionary war can't happen everytime. Also, the Union came through and burned the cotton fields and resources so that the south would STARVE. That's fair warfare, huh?

Answer 68

Reagan’s deficits totaled more than the deficits of all the presidents before him combined.
A. True
B. False

Answer 69

@AnimeWover Definitely true.

Answer 70

IF THEY WERE AT WAR OF COURSE THEY WOULD WANT THEM TO STARVE.

Answer 71

Bill Clinton was found guilty of committing “high crimes and misdemeanors”.
A. True
B. False

Answer 72

^^Most likely false...

Answer 73

anyway I won't pitch in. I am the announcer!

Answer 74

(Lol....heated politics and openstudy questions simultaneously. This is amusing XD)
I'm just saying....how can you expect an already poor people to pull through if the Union's taking cheap shots like that? They burned fields and homes. They robbed FAMILIES. They were no better than the British. The South wanted nothing more than to be left alone.

Answer 75

Yankee, putting rules on warfare is like trying to stop the sun from rising. It's not going to work. In conflict, anything goes. The concept of total war, which was used by the North, meant that EVERYTHING not wearing Union Colors died, period. War is not about armies gallantly charging each other, where everything is decided simply and with honor. Every soul who has fought in conflict knows this. War is at heart, a terrible thing, messy, ethically wrong and horrific. There are no rules in anarchy.

Answer 76

I would help with the questions, too, but I don't know so much of modern stuffs.

Answer 77

Yeah, it's false Anime.

Answer 78

Well. The south wanted slavery. Could you blame the union for wanting them GONE? Of course they would ROB THEM IN WAR. What part don't you understand? Being left alone, also meant slavery. it's really a shame

Answer 79

w did the Cold War between the US and U.S.S.R. end?
A. Communism failed the U.S.S.R. collapsed.
B. The U.S. bombed the Soviet Union into collapse.
C. Kruschev surrendered to the United States.

Answer 80

Because communism collapsed. Thanks to Reagan.

Answer 81

XD

Answer 82

We had a huge deficit during Clinton’s presidency.
A. True
B. False

Answer 83

I think? Let's go with true.

Answer 84

And don't pull that "No money" Bull on me. There were rich people down south with slaves.

Answer 85

The United States is attractive to immigrants from all over the world.
A. True
B. False

Answer 86

I understand that there are no rules when it is soldier on soldier. But the families had no say! The children and wives...You think they could decide when women couldn't even vote?

Besides; if the USA is suddenly the slave-savers of the world, why aren't they going after all the other countries in the world who own slaves? Also, Black men in the union army were paid HALF the wage of a white soldier and weren't allowed to fight side by side with them; they had to have their own units. Whereas in the Confederacy they were paid in FULL and treated like human beings. Plus, they were guaranteed freedom after a certain period of service. Which one sounds more racist to you? (By the way, the Union had slaves, too.)

(That's true about the immigrants, btw)

Answer 87

Yes. There were some rich folk. But most of them were poor farmers. Yes, there were plantation owners. No, they didn't make up the majority of the populous. So there were a few (several, actually) screwed up businessmen in the South; that doesn't mean every southerner was a racist swine.

Answer 88

Well OBVIOUSLY BLACKS HAD NO RIGHTS BACK THEN! And why would they want to invade all over the world? USA didn't want ANY PART of the eastern countries. Not unless it's REALLY NEEDED. We didn't wanna seem like a tyrant. More of an Ally. If you don't understand that...

Answer 89

IT'S OBVIOUS THE FAMILIES ARE IN DANGER. They were not going to have a say. In war there is no emotion. Just WAR AND BLOOD

Answer 90

Other countries can fight back. A lot more than the South could.

Answer 91

Exactly

Answer 92

Telling what was formerly home territory to do is one thing, telling Russia what to do is another thing entirely.

Answer 93

We are not going to invade countries that can fight back. HARD. Especially if we had a fight in our OWN COUNTRY. It's Logic. Fix out peace. NEVER make enemies.

Answer 94

But we already have Arabic and terrorists kill our countries. Why would we want to invade them to make it worse? THINK PLEASE (Not racist against arabics, but most of them are terroists)

Answer 95

killing* country*

Answer 96

Of course the families had no say, but they were part of the total war concept. It meant that family or no, they were still enemies, and thus they were attacked. Nullifying the population does wonders for suppressing rebellion. After all, there is no rebellion if there is no one to rebel.

Answer 97

Many of the folks in the confederacy held no hatred toward blacks (although you did have your few.) The South gave its best. The were outnumbered, outmanned, outsupplied, but never out fought. The confederates were courageous and fought for their state's rights. (Some did it for slavery, but not most. But people focus on the bad ones.) That's all you can ask from a man is to give it his best. Whether they won or not, they did their best. And for being such weaklings, they fought hard for almost fives years and took 67,000 men with them and mortally wounded 43,000

Answer 98

And then they lost. Shows where all their courage and whatnot got them.