.hjh
Well, the average rate of change between two points is simply the slope between them. So I assume you know slope to be determined by \[\frac{ y_{2} - y_{1} }{ x_{2}-x_{1} }\] So in the first statement, if the average rate of change, the slope, is 0, what must be true about \[\frac{ y_{2}-y_{1} }{ x_{2}-x_{1} }\]?
I don't know xc ... maybe between -3 and 3 there are solutions?
Well, if the average rate of change is 0 then the slope is 0. Which means \[\frac{ y_{2} - y_{1} }{ x_{2}-x_{1} } = 0\] Basically, how can we make that fraction for slope =0?
would the demominaters be -3 and 3? 3-(-3)
Yes, they would be. So you would have \[\frac{ y_{2}-y_{1} }{ 6 } = 0\] So what does that say about y_2 and y_1?
That there not identified yet?
|dw:1433728163730:dw|
Sorry, not trying to tease or anything, just wanted you to see it. Well, the only way a fraction can be 0 is if the numerator is 0. Which means \(y_{2} - y_{1} = 0\) \(y_{1} = y_{2}\) The idea is that the y coordinate of both points has to be the same in order for the average rate of change to be 0. That make sense?
Kinda, it makes the reasoning for why its 0
would that explain tuckers part on why he's correct? or is there more to tuckers reasoning :o
Yeah, exactly. So the first person is essentialy saying the y-coordinates for both points are the same. It doesnt matter what they are, we just want them to be the same. So, for example, lets say our y-value is 0. So we would have the points (-3,0) and (3,0).
As for the 2nd person, considering the graph between -3 and 3 we know it'll go up and then back down. But at the same time, we also want the graph to start and begin at the same y-value. So we want something like this. |dw:1433728476305:dw| So, the best example of how this is possible is if the graph is a parabola. But really, any continuous function that has the same y-coordinate at x = -3 and x = 3 and is not a line will make them both correct.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!