In session 27, it is mentioned that the tangent plane should contain the tangent lines of the partial functions at point P. Does that not meant that the normal of the tangent plane is equal to the cross product of the tangent lines? If so, does it not contradict grad f = normal of tangent plane?
there should be no contradiction as \( \vec r = <x,y,f(x,y)>\) then \( \vec {r_x} = <1,0,f_x>\) and \( \vec {r_x} = <0, 1, f_y>\) and \(\vec {r_x} \ \times \vec {r_y}\) is \[\left|\begin{matrix}\hat x & \hat y & \hat z\\ 1 & 0 & f_x \\ 0 & 1 & f_y\end{matrix}\right|\] which is \(<-f_x, -f_y, 1>\) in terms of the gradient, it is important to note that it is NOT grad f that gives the normal but grad \(\Phi\) where \(\Phi = z - f(x,y) = 0\) thus \(\nabla \Phi = <-f_x, -f_y, 1>\), which is the same thing IOW \(\nabla \Phi \ne \nabla z\)
oops, typo, that second \( \vec{r_x}\) should *obviously* be \( \vec{r_y}\)
Thanks! I was being careless :(
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!