Question

What did the attorneys representing Linda Brown in Brown v. the Board of Education of Topeka argue?

A) that segregated schools needed more funding

B) that Linda Brown should be allowed to attend an all-African American school closer to her home

C) that the Constitution did not guarantee the right to an equal public education for all

D) that segregated schools did not offer equal educational opportunities
@pandemonium

Answer 1

I'm glad I'm not 40 😂

Answer 2

ur cute :*

Answer 3

Thx :*

Answer 4

but can i have some cute help??

Answer 5

Also C is the best answer there

Answer 6

lol thanks XD

Answer 7

Ur very cute ur self :*

Answer 8

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and its legal offspring, the Legal Defense and Educational Fund, developed a systematic attack against the doctrine of “separate but equal.” The campaign started at the graduate and professional educational levels. The attack culminated in five separate cases gathered together under the name of one of them—Oliver Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas.

Aware of the gravity of the issue and concerned with the possible political and social repercussions, the U.S. Supreme Court heard the case argued on three separate occasions in as many years. The Court weighed carefully considerations involving adherence to legal precedent, social-science findings on the negative effects of segregation, and the marked inferiority of the schools that African Americans were forced to attend.

The Supreme Court announced its unanimous decision on May 17, 1954. It held that school segregation violated the Equal Protection and Due Process clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The following year the Court ordered desegregation “with all deliberate speed.”

Answer 9

haha ur stoned im the farthest from it
but thx

Answer 10

lol thanks @danicap