Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 20 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

sorry i got caught up in a few things but i finally finished can you please check it for me @phi

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (phi):

For Q3, I would put parens around the first k+1 and it makes sense to simplify (k+1)+1 to k+2 so (k+1)(k+2)

OpenStudy (phi):

OK on the first part (but someone might want to see your algebra on Q2 )

OpenStudy (phi):

Also, in Q3, the second line is not correct. the terms for n=2, 3, 4 ... do not exist for P1 in other words, it is just 2 = 1(1+1) 2 = 2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so what do i put

OpenStudy (phi):

For Q2, it would be better to write it as a proof, which is much more formal. try to follow the exact steps in the posted example (see the original question)

OpenStudy (phi):

P1: 2 = 2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh ok

OpenStudy (phi):

in Q2, at the end, once you get the formula using k, just say that this "proves the identity" for k = (n+1). do not put in = n(6n^2 -3n-1)/2 because that is confusing.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok then for Q3 what was wrong

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!