The vertex of x2 + 2x - 4y + 9 = 0 A. (-1,2) B. (1,2) C. (-1,-3) D. (1,-3)
Im not really sure how to do this problem
-b/2a
it's one of those shortcut formulas When working with the vertex form of a quadratic equation \[h = \frac{-b}{2a}\] and k=f(h) . The a and b portions come from \[ax^2+bx+c \]
Ok look first let us get the y to a side alone so you get: y=x^2/4 + x/2 + 9/2 right?
so plus 4y?
The to get the vertex we should find the derivative of y and equate it to 0 correct?
derivatives have nothing to do with finding the vertex.
derivatives is in all levels of Calculus... we're just dealing with quadratic equations... which is College Algebra or even lower.
get this equation in this form \[y=ax^2+bx+c \]
4y=x^2+2x+9
like that?
yeah let me double check this for a minute.
\[x^2 + 2x - 4y + 9 = 0 \rightarrow x^2+2x+9=4y \] because we are sort of dealing with this backwards, but I don't think it should be a problem
now divide the entire equation by 4
Oh really smartipants let me enlighten you the derivative is the slope of the tan at a specific pt so when you find the derivative of a function and you equate to 0 that means your dealing with the line parallel to the x -axis (slope=0) which is the vertex hahahaha everything works on derivates you clever one I dont advise to tell anybody this again because they'll laugh at you :)
@UsukiDoll
And I just reported you for that comment ^
Dylan are you familiar with derivates or not? So ill continue explaining?
and if OP isn't familiar with derivatives, that technique shouldn't be used.
i am not familiar with it sorry..
See I told you that's a bad idea @joyraheb. And you trying to outsmart me makes it even worse. No one should trust anyone with a lower SS.
Hahhahahah report thats your way to defend your mathematics 😂 did I even curse well I'll give you an advise, beware of your false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance. :)
Being rude on here counts as getting you reported man... and Dylan already admit to not knowing derivatives, so that technique you are suggesting isn't going to work.
y=(x^2/4)+.5+2.25
is that is divided by 4?
keep your equation in fraction form. Decimals are messy.
\[x^2+2x+9=4y \rightarrow \frac{x^2}{4}+\frac{1}{2}x+\frac{9}{4}\]
okay i see
\[\frac{1}{4}x^2+\frac{1}{2}x+\frac{9}{4} = y\]
Any parabola can be represented by the parallelism they posses on either axis of reference (xoy). We can take the expression you posted to the structure: \[y=ax^2+bx+c\] This is also the equation that represents a parabola parallel to the y-axis, so I will, without proof give you the structure of the coordinates that represent the vertice: \[V(-\frac{ b }{ 2a },\frac{ 4ac-b^2 }{ 4a })\] So, taking the conic equation you gave: \[x^2+2x-4y+9=0\] We will isolate the "y" term in order to make the coefficients "a", "b" and "c" evident: \[y=\frac{ 1 }{ 4 }x^2+\frac{ 1 }{ 2 }x+\frac{ 9 }{ 4 }\] And then you use the structure I gave you, to find the coordinates of the vertex.
so far so good everyone.
so now we let \[a= \frac{1}{4}, b =\frac{1}{2}, c =\frac{9}{4} \] and plug it into \[V(-\frac{ b }{ 2a },\frac{ 4ac-b^2 }{ 4a }) \]
how can i plug it in if i don't know what a is?
remember our quadratic equation . here is the standard form \[ax^2+bx+c \] and you have this equation \[y=\frac{ 1 }{ 4 }x^2+\frac{ 1 }{ 2 }x+\frac{ 9 }{ 4 }\] so comparing these two equations we have our a b and c
but you just said a = the equation and i don't know what a is so i can't plug it in the vertex formula
The coefficient of "x^2"
please read my previous comment. you can get a, b, and c, by comparing your equation to the standard. you will see that a = 1/4, b =1/2, and c=9/4
okay
\[ax^2+bx+c \] <- standard form \[\frac{ 1 }{ 4 }x^2+\frac{ 1 }{ 2 }x+\frac{ 9 }{ 4 } \] < - your equation.
so a = 1/4, b =1/2, and c=9/4
our vertex formula \[V(-\frac{ b }{ 2a },\frac{ 4ac-b^2 }{ 4a }) \] you just have to plug a, b, and c into these formulas, then we have our vertex.
let's do the first one together if b = 1/2 and a = 1/4 \[\frac{-b}{2a} \] so we place b =1/2 and a =1/4 in that formula \[\LARGE \frac{-\frac{1}{2}}{2(\frac{1}{4})} \] \[\LARGE \frac{-\frac{1}{2}}{(\frac{2}{4})} \]
i got (2,1)
wait hold on
(1,?) i almost got it
well let's go a bit slowly on this . \[\LARGE \frac{-\frac{1}{2}}{(\frac{2}{4})} \] the bottom fraction can be reduced further if we divide 2 on the numerator and denominator on 2/4 we have 1/2 \[\LARGE \frac{-\frac{1}{2}}{(\frac{1}{2})} \] then flip the second fraction and we should have \[\frac{-1}{2} \times \frac{2}{1} \]
(1,2)???
is that right?
i just got confused on plugging it in but then i did it what i think was right and thats the answer i got
what's \[\frac{-1}{2} \times \frac{2}{1} \] what's -1 x 2 and what's 2 x 1?
-2 and 2
yes so we have \[\frac{-2}{2} \] now what's -2 divided by 2
-1
yes that's the first part of our vertex.
(-1,?)
\[V(-1,\frac{ 4ac-b^2 }{ 4a }) \] a=1/4, b =1/2, c =9/4
2
(-1,2)
we're lucky because the denominator will just be 1 so we just have the numerator to deal with \[\frac{4}{4} \rightarrow 1 \]
\[4ac-b^2 \] is all we need to deal with \[\[4\frac{1}{4}\frac{9}{4}-(\frac{1}{2})^2 \] \]
so let's deal with the right part of this formula. what's \[(\frac{1}{2})^2 \rightarrow \frac{1}{2} \times \frac{1}{2} \]
1/4
yeah. \[\[4\frac{1}{4}\frac{9}{4}-\frac{1}{4}\]
so now what's \[4 \times \frac{1}{4} \times \frac{9}{4}\] the fraction parts would be easier to do first
its 2.25
then minus the .25
it equals 2
errrrrrrrr please keep your answers in fraction form.. decimals are messy!
decimals make more sense to me
(-1,2)
fractions are easier to deal with though...
\[4 \times \frac{1}{4} \times \frac{9}{4} -\frac{1}{4} \] \[4 \times \frac{9}{16} -\frac{1}{4} \] \[\frac{36}{16} -\frac{1}{4} \] reducing the left fraction by dividing 4 on the numerator and denominator \[\frac{9}{4} -\frac{1}{4} \] same numerator so we have 8/4 which is 2 :)
yay we got our vertex!
thank you!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!