The table below shows preferences of dancing or playing sports for male and female students: Do you prefer dancing or playing sports? Playing sports Dancing Row totals Male students 18 16 34 Female students 18 35 53 Column totals 36 51 87
Mason mistakenly calculated the conditional relative frequency for female students who prefer playing sports to be 21%. What statistic did Mason actually calculate, and what should he have done differently? He calculated the marginal relative frequency of female students who prefer playing sports. The conditional relative frequency for female students who prefer playing sports is 34%. He calculated the joint relative frequency of female students who prefer playing sports. The conditional relative frequency for female students who prefer playing sports is 50%. He calculated the marginal relative frequency of female students who prefer playing sports. The conditional relative frequency for female students who prefer playing sports is 50%. He calculated the joint relative frequency of female students who prefer playing sports. The conditional relative frequency for female students who prefer playing sports is 34%.
@teagirl7630
can you help
I can attempt, let me read through first, and then I'll attempt to explain.
ok
do you know @taramgrant0543664
Nope, not at all
dang it but nice try @teagirl7630
@chrisdbest
@wil476003
The last one there
can you explain plz @taramgrant0543664
Joint relative frequency is the ratio of the frequency in a particular category and the total number of data values. This would be the 18 out of 87 which is 21%. Conditional relative frequency numbers are the ratio of a joint relative frequency and related marginal relative frequency. This would be 18 out of 53 which is 34%
What he did was number of females who liked playing sports divided by the total number of people instead of the total number of girls
Thank you so much @taramgrant0543664
No problem!
:)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!