"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Which of the following possible court cases could be argued under the terms of the quote above?

Question

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Which of the following possible court cases could be argued under the terms of the quote above?

anonymous · Answer

a. a person sues the state for building an armory on nearby property
b. a person refuses to serve the military when called up through a draft
c. a person shoots and kills someone who broke into the family's home
d. a person rejects police requests to unlock the car doors and windows 
i think its d

anonymous · Answer

@misssunshinexxoxo

misssunshinexxoxo · Answer

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, "

misssunshinexxoxo · Answer

D seems to agree with it though

misssunshinexxoxo · Answer

"could be argued under the terms of the quote above?" C seems more probable

anonymous · Answer

c seems right

misssunshinexxoxo · Answer

The quote agrees with D. When they call in a swat team to take evidence after a murder. They don't generally need a search warrant.

misssunshinexxoxo · Answer

C is more likely to be probable

anonymous · Answer

oh okai ... can u help me with some more if i make them new questions?