Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 6 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Measuring Integrals .. Need a suggestion on how I should approach this one. Image Coming...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (dan815):

yep 6 is right

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Lol, you think I should just tell them they are correct and move on?

OpenStudy (dan815):

http://prntscr.com/7tsrio

OpenStudy (dan815):

from 1 to 3, the most that curve is fluctuating* is between a change in range of 0.5

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I need a good way to say that the variance around y=2 equates to no more than 0.6 in error.

OpenStudy (dan815):

what a second that doesnt make sense actually, the area should be 4 not 6

OpenStudy (dan815):

if it was integral from 0 to 3 then it would be 6

OpenStudy (anonymous):

its in the interval 1 to 3, so it's about 3*2

OpenStudy (empty):

See the area of that rectangle outside and below is AT LEAST the integral, while the rectangle around the function represents your error

OpenStudy (anonymous):

no? oh yeah..

OpenStudy (anonymous):

1 to 3 would be 2...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

damn them... lol

OpenStudy (empty):

Yeahhhhhh this is bunk yo

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So I get the satisfaction of telling them that the error is in fact a LOT MORE THAN 0.6!!!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Given that the curve shows properties of a sin wave, with 4 peaks over the interval 1 to 3, and has an amplitude of less than .2 .. Is there a better way to approximate the error?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it appears that both the amplitude and the wavelength are changing

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Im going to ignore that they messed up the integral equation, and assume they meant from 1 to 4, as per the written portion.

OpenStudy (dan815):

http://prntscr.com/7tszig

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thanks dan, that will work.. just integrate the min and max, then calc the difference. // maybe 1/2 the difference.

OpenStudy (dan815):

yeah they just want you to show its less than 0.6

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No integration required folks. The width of the area is 2 units (x from 1 to 3). The max height of the area is \[2+0.05(3)\sin \left( 3 \times 3^{2}\right)\] The min height of the area is \[2-0.05(3)\sin \left( 3 \times 3^{2}\right)\]Calculate the the difference between the two areas to show the error is <0.6

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thats brilliant ospreytriple .. I like that. that's a real solution.. only problem is, they 're asking to "explain how the plot tells you ....". So I think I'm supposed to use the image.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I think they want me to say. The plot is saying there is a region of about + / - 0.2 that is centered on 2. And if we measure that area from x=1 to x=4, (Which is what I think they actually want me to measure, and the range of 1 to 3 was an error.. then we get.. width = 3 * 0.2 =0.6.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

width =3 height = 0.2 width * height = 0.6

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That might work as an estimate. You came up with 0.2 by examining the graph?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes 0;2 by looking at the plot

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I think I would write it as +/- 0.6

OpenStudy (anonymous):

If that satisfies your teacher, then fine. If you need more precision, you can use the function as I showed above.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thanks, I like that option too. I might include it.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

If I was grading your work, I would accept your explanation form examining the graph. But every teacher is different.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!