Number theory help. How did they conclude gh = 1? (at the bottom of page 17)
https://books.google.com/books?id=eVwvvwZeBf4C&lpg=PA3&pg=PA17#v=onepage&q&f=false
Oh I love that book. I've used it last year.
how far did you get because right before they say that they have d=ghd and dividing d on both sides gives 1=gh (Assuming d isn't 0 )
@UsukiDoll yeah I like it too. Certainly better than the one wrote by Stein
also we know d isn't zero since it is given in the theorem that a and b are not 0
O: oh, I see it now.
The whole time i was reading d2 = gh d1 .
This question is a false alarm XD. I was having a brain fart :P sorry people lol
d = ghd ... when d was divided it left 1 = gh so g = 1 and h = 1 which are the only values that satisfy 1=gh
xD I'm still wondering how people master proofs x.x like I don't mind easy ones, but the hard ones are crazy
@freckles thanks for clarifying :)
You know what. While we're at it, can any one explain how they got 0 <= r_i <= b-i?
\(gd_1 = d_2\) and \(hd_2 = d_1\) \(d_2 = \dfrac{d_1}{h} \) Equate the two expressions for \(d_2\) \(gd_1 = \dfrac{d_1}{h} \) \(ghd_1 = d_1\) \(gh = 1\)
They said it's by induction though :/ @mathstudent55 thank you. I got that part :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!