Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 19 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Number theory help. How did they conclude gh = 1? (at the bottom of page 17)

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

Oh I love that book. I've used it last year.

OpenStudy (freckles):

how far did you get because right before they say that they have d=ghd and dividing d on both sides gives 1=gh (Assuming d isn't 0 )

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@UsukiDoll yeah I like it too. Certainly better than the one wrote by Stein

OpenStudy (freckles):

also we know d isn't zero since it is given in the theorem that a and b are not 0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

O: oh, I see it now.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The whole time i was reading d2 = gh d1 .

OpenStudy (anonymous):

This question is a false alarm XD. I was having a brain fart :P sorry people lol

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

d = ghd ... when d was divided it left 1 = gh so g = 1 and h = 1 which are the only values that satisfy 1=gh

OpenStudy (usukidoll):

xD I'm still wondering how people master proofs x.x like I don't mind easy ones, but the hard ones are crazy

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@freckles thanks for clarifying :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You know what. While we're at it, can any one explain how they got 0 <= r_i <= b-i?

OpenStudy (mathstudent55):

\(gd_1 = d_2\) and \(hd_2 = d_1\) \(d_2 = \dfrac{d_1}{h} \) Equate the two expressions for \(d_2\) \(gd_1 = \dfrac{d_1}{h} \) \(ghd_1 = d_1\) \(gh = 1\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

They said it's by induction though :/ @mathstudent55 thank you. I got that part :)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!