Hi I need help with this proof to prove Converse of the Side-Splitter Theorem: Given: XR over RQ = YS OVER SQ Prove: Line RS is parellel to Line XY Thanks
Here is a copy of the picture and the statements given.
For 5 the reason would be SAS similarity criterion
Do you know what 6 & 7 would be?
as nish states SAS (for similar triangles) see http://www.regentsprep.org/Regents/math/geometry/GP11/LsimilarProof.htm
once you have shown two triangles are similar then you know "corresponding angles" are congruent.
finally, if corresponding angles of a transversal are congruent, the lines are parallel
Thanks
Could you also help me with reason 2 & 3? I got those incorrect also. Thanks
I would need a list of the reasons you have learned. in step 2, you add 1 to both sides (in the form RQ/RQ and SQ/SQ) the reason that is ok would read something like " equality remains true when you add equal amounts to both sides" for step 3, you replace XR+RQ with XQ (and also YS+SQ with YQ) the reason would be something like "the whole is the sum of its parts"
reason 2 is not substitution
Can you help with the Converse of the Side Splitter Theorem proof
Reason 1. Given Reason 2. A property of proportions Reason 3. Segment addition postulate Reason 4. Congruence of angles is reflexive (this is a theorem) Reason 5. SAS Similarity Reason 6. Definition of similar triangles Reason 7. When two lines are cut by a transversal such that corresponding angles are congruent, then the lines are parallel. (this is a postulate)
Thanks.
You're welcome.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!