Anyone know any problems that are "easy to understand but impossible to solve"? Like Goldbach's conjecture or Fermat's last theorem for instance.
You may have tried this but have you googled "unsolved theorems?"
Also, FLT was solved in 1996.
Haha well that's true, but I didn't mean it literally. I could google up unsolved problems, but I wanted to find some that other people had come across that maybe we could try to think about and try to solve together rather than alone.
ya the unsolved mysteries about aliens and how the american government is trying to keep it from us
I've got 1 but before that u need to give me the best defination of sonic boom.
Haha I don't know what the best definition of a sonic boom is, I think it relates to going faster than the speed of sound and somehow creates a shockwave by displacing air or something fancy lol
Ok now the question is - why doesn't light create sonic booms?? ¿¿
|dw:1437977975618:dw|
light does not make sonic booms, because by definition sonic = sound
Got one: Question: Five pirates are parting ways after finding a treasure of 100 pieces of gold. The pirates decide to split it based on a vote. Each pirate, from oldest to youngest, gets to propose a plan on how to split the gold. If at least 50 percent of the other remaining pirates agree on the plan, that is how they will split the gold. If less than 50 percent of the pirates agree, the pirate who came up with the plan will be thrown overboard. Each pirate is smart, greedy, and wants to throw as many others overboard as possible without reducing the amount of gold they get. What plan can the first (oldest) pirate propose to live and get as much gold as possible?
instead light's version is redshift
I didn't get that @nincompoop
ya don't focus on the redshift LAUGHING OUT LOUD but sonic = sound
oooh good questions @hhopke and @imqwerty and... hahaha you too @Astrophysics :'(
I've got 1 more wait
do not focus on the word use, but instead on the mechanism doppler effect is a characteristic that both sound and light produce. less focus on the word, but more on mechanics and equation
I am looking in my differential equations book since I remember shockwaves came about from solving with the method of characteristics or something.
there are some phenomenon that the english language or other language cannot describe properly
yeah like things that aren't particles or waves... :P
laughing out loud
I think i must learn about redshifts nd ol nd then come here to debate.
qwerty made a uniform spherical magnet. Where are the poles of that magnet located??
use ferromagnetic metal
metal sheet
magnetism ftw
hahaha the poles are on the outside and center?
isn't this what gauss proved?
Prove that u can make an A4 size paper reach mounteverset's top with one end of the paper touching the groung nd the other end at the top. U can tear the paper.
well, tear a piece, leave it on the ground, then take the other piece to the top of the mountain lol.
Well played...
U can't tear the paper nt even a bit
Nd the mounteverset is the real mounteverset nd nt a plastic toy or drawing.
Ik the answer to this one :)
can we use magnetic flux on that sphere magnet pole problem?
U need to prove your answer theoretically
Wait- do they have to be on the ground and at the top at the same time?
Could we use tesseracts? Like from a wrinkle in time?
Ooooh explain that that sounds cool
I was just going to do something like cut the paper like this: |dw:1437979349526:dw|
no cutting nor tearing
ok ok crap
use tangent ratio
Well technically the top of mount everest is the ground at that point... XD
|dw:1437979534544:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!