Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 7 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Find the interval on which the curve of "picture below" is concave up

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@Ashleyisakitty @ganeshie8 @Hero @jim_thompson5910

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i know i have to find the second derivative im just not sure how

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[y=\int\limits_{0}^{x}\frac{ dt }{ 1+t+t^2 }=\int\limits_{0}^{x}\frac{ dt }{ t^2+t+\frac{ 1 }{ 4 }-\frac{ 1 }{ 4 }+1 }\] \[=\int\limits_{0}^{x}\frac{ dt }{ \left( t+\frac{ 1 }{ 2 } \right)^2+\frac{ 3 }{ 4 } }=\int\limits_{0}^{x}\frac{ dt }{ \left( t+\frac{ 1 }{ 2 } \right)^2+\left( \frac{ \sqrt{3} }{ 2 } \right)^2 }\] \[=\frac{ 1 }{ \frac{ \sqrt{3} }{ 2 } }\tan^{-1} \frac{ t+\frac{ 1 }{ 2 } }{ \frac{ \sqrt{3} }{ 2 } }|0\rightarrow x\] \[=\frac{ 2 }{ \sqrt{3} }\tan^{-1} \frac{ 2t+1 }{ \sqrt{3} }|0\rightarrow\ x\] \[=\frac{ 2 }{ \sqrt{3} }\left\{ \tan^{-1} \left( \frac{ 2x+1 }{ \sqrt{3} }\right)-\tan^{-1}\frac{ 1 }{ \sqrt{3} } \right\}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

wow okay give me a second to read that...

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

@surjithayer there's no need to integrate you just need to find \(\Large \frac{d^2y}{dx^2}\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh no first derivative is the integrand

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh what @jim_thompson5910 said

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

the first derivative is not too bad because you can use the fundamental theorem of calculus

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yea thats what im having a problem with , do i just plug in x for every where t is at and then integrate that or do i just plug in x and then that's my first derivative?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

first derivative replace each \(t\) in the integrand by an \(x\) that is all then take the derivative of the result to get the second derivative

OpenStudy (anonymous):

interval is 0 to x or we can change it to x then diff.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i mean derive not integrate

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yeah plug in x for t

OpenStudy (anonymous):

then DIFFERENTIATE that , not integrate

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay okay one second let me do that

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i also said differentiate.

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (one of the 2 parts) If \[\Large g(x) = \int_{a}^{x}f(t)dt\] then \[\Large g \ '(x) = f(x)\]

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

surjithayer you weren't incorrect. It was just a step in the opposite direction adding unnecessary steps. Then again, doing it that way helps see how the FTC works

OpenStudy (anonymous):

sorry, i have not used that theorem.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thank you for reminding me.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay im getting \[\frac{-(2x+1) }{ (x^2+x+1)^2}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

looks good to me

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

agreed

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i would have written the numerator as \[-2x-1\] so that you can solve \[-2x-1>0\] rather easily

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay out of curiosity whats the second part of the theorem ... it sounds very "fundamental "

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that is that \(F(b)-F(a)\) business

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

Other part of FTC \[\Large \int_{a}^{b}f \ '(x) dx = f(b) - f(a)\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

arh damn i don't know who to give the medal too you were all so helpful

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

Most books make F ' = f, which is confusing to me because there are 2 different f's to keep track of

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thats weird every time i see F it means \[intf(x)\]

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

F ' = f is equivalent to saying "F is the indefinite integral of f"

OpenStudy (anonymous):

notation like to be the death of us all nothing worse than having two identical notations for different things

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ill keep that in mind :D thanks again every one !!

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

the reason I set up FTC 2 that way was because most calc courses start with derivatives and then teach integrals. So why not set up the integral in terms of a derivative

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

no problem

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay real quick so i should graph that and where its positive is the integral that the original graph is concave up right?!?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it is concave up where \[-2x-1>0\]

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

Exactly. The denominator is always positive, so you can ignore that portion and focus on where the numerator is positive.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so it would be (-infinity , -.5) right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay ill go ahead and take that as a silent nod

jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):

yes when x < -1/2

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!