help!
@SithsAndGiggles
Hey!
why to check integer roots of a polynomial modulo is used. I am bit confused with such notion. Anyone please explain the use of modulo precisely in proving that polynomial has no integer roots.
which notation ?
wait! is it about the constant term being divisible by 2. I get this ?!! But why 2
2 has nothing to do with the problem since 1) the coefficients are integers and 2) you're looking for integer roots, you are allowed to use modular arithmetic here
consider a quick example : \[P(x) = x^2-2x +1 = 0 \] suppose \(n\) is an integer root, then we have : \[P(n) = n^2-2n+1 = 0\] we are allowed to take mod both sides because we're dealing with integers (n and all coefficients are integers)
taking mod 2 both sides you get \[ n^2-2n+1 \equiv 0 \pmod{2}\] which is same as \[ n^2+1 \equiv 0 \pmod{2}\]
computations get simpler in modular arithmetic, observe that middle -2n term has just disappeared in mod2!
they are picking mod2 because it is simpler
It doesn't matter which modulus, \(m\), you pick it will be true everywhere.
so is below statement clear ? If \(n\) is an integer root of a polynomial \(P(x)\) with integer coeffcients, then \(P(n) \equiv 0 \pmod{m}\).
yes! now for the question. Can the same technique be used. Like f(x)=(x-a)(x-b)(x-c)(x-d)r(x)+5 and.......?????
what same technique ? do you have a solution ?
The actual problem turns out to be much simpler, we don't need fancy modular arithmetic etc...
okay ! :)
Lets first look at a rough sketch of \(f(x)\) since \(f(a)=f(b)=f(c)=f(d)=5\), the graph looks something like : |dw:1438956400888:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!