Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 8 Online
OpenStudy (mathivh):

Partial derivative in terms of x and y

OpenStudy (mathivh):

What is the partial derivate in terms of x and in terms of y? \[\int\limits_{x}^{y}e^{{-t}^{2}}dt\] The solutions are: \[\frac{ df }{ dx }=-e^{{-x}^{2}}\] and \[\frac{ df }{ dy }=e^{{-y}^{2}}\]

OpenStudy (loser66):

What don't you understand?

OpenStudy (mathivh):

I don't know how to get the 't' to terms of x and y. I first tried the derivative in terms of t under the integral sign but that still contains \[e^{{-t}^2}\] which I shouldn't be integrating I guess (becomes it would to some erf function)

OpenStudy (loser66):

Partial of x means y is a constant, right?

OpenStudy (loser66):

\[\int_x^y e^{-t^2}dt=-\int_y^x e^{-t^2}dt\]

OpenStudy (loser66):

By Fundamental theorem, its derivative is just replace t by x it is = \(-e^{-x^2}\)

OpenStudy (loser66):

partial w.r.t. y is just as it is and consider x as constant. YOu replace t by y and get the solution as given. \(e^{-y^2}\)

OpenStudy (mathivh):

Ok, but why is it that partial w.r.t. x is taken after switching the limits of the integral?

OpenStudy (loser66):

because the Fundamental theorem of calculus just apply to lower limit is a constant.

OpenStudy (mathivh):

Ok I understand it now, thank you for your time!

OpenStudy (mathivh):

Interesting read, strange that my textbook didn't mention anything of this theorem.

OpenStudy (loser66):

Actually, I learn it from this site, not from my school/books That's why I love this site. :)

OpenStudy (loser66):

@mathivh if you want to take derivative of the integral w.r.t.y, you consider x as constant. \[\int_x^y e^{-t^2}dt= e^{-y^2} \] Actually, it is \(e^{-y^2}*y'\) but \(y'=1\), they don't put it there. In the new case, \[\int_x^{xy} e^{-t^2}dt \] The upper limit is a function of y, you must take its derivative, hence it becomes \[= e^{-y^2} (xy)' = e^{-y^2}*x\] That is why x is there.

OpenStudy (loser66):

If the upper limit is y^2, then your result will be \(e^{(-y^2)^2}*(y^2)'= 2y e^{-y^4}\) Is it clear??

OpenStudy (mathivh):

It is clear now, thanks again! ;)

OpenStudy (mathivh):

In the second last post you made, I would think the last equation would be: \[= e^{-x^{2}y^{2}}(xy)'=e^{-x^{2}y^{2}}*x\] Because you mentioned to replace t by the upper limit of the integral?

OpenStudy (loser66):

What is the original problem? I don't get what you meant on the last post

OpenStudy (loser66):

oh, yeah, typo there. I see it.

OpenStudy (mathivh):

Or does the lower limit changes something about this? Because \[\int\limits_{0}^{xy}e^{{-t}^{2}}= e^{-x^{2}y^{2}}(xy)'\]

OpenStudy (loser66):

Don't forget that is the PARTIAL DERIVATIVE w.r.t.y , as long as the lower limit is not y or function of y, you are ok.

OpenStudy (mathivh):

So it should be \[e^{-x^{2}y^{2}}*x\] instead of \[e^{-y^{2}}*x\] right?

OpenStudy (loser66):

yes, you are right. My bad.

OpenStudy (mathivh):

It's ok :) What would change if the lower limit were to contain y aswell?

OpenStudy (loser66):

In that case, you have to take integral, then derivative of the result. No choice.

OpenStudy (loser66):

oh, you can break it. Give me an example, I will show you how

OpenStudy (loser66):

brb

OpenStudy (mathivh):

I don't have any exercise like that, I was just curious. An example would be: \[\int\limits_{y}^{xy} e^{{-t}^{2}}dt\] You say one should integrate it first, but that would give the erf function which we don't want to use most likely.

OpenStudy (loser66):

|dw:1439212948147:dw|

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!