Lines k and p are perpendicular, neither is vertical and p passes through the origin. Which is greater? A. The product of the slopes of lines k and p B. The product of the y-intercepts of lines k and p
Perpendicular lines have opposite reciprocal slope. If we say the slope of line k is \(m\), then the slope of line p would have to be \((-\frac{ 1 }{ m})\). What's \[m * \frac{ -1 }{ m }\]
-1
right, so we know the result for A is -1.
wait why is it -1? how did u get that?
That's what we just did. I was just restating the result
I don't understand how we got that....
we got -1 from the multiplication you did. m*(-1/m)
yea but where and how did u get that?
Perpendicular lines have opposite reciprocal slope. If we say the slope of line k is m, then the slope of line p would have to be (−1/m).
oh okay. but for the problem itself it didn't give the slope
we don't need to know the slope. Knowing the relationship between the two lines is enough because they don't ask for the actual slopes. They only ask for their products
hmmmm ok
so whats next?
now we look at B. It says line p passes through the origin, so that means its y-intercept is 0. We don't need to know the y-intercept of line k because any number multiplied by 0, is 0. That means the result for B is 0.
Okay so i get B but for A how do we know it's a positive slope and not a negative one?
|dw:1439429848426:dw|
it doesn't matter. If we said k had a slope of -m, then the opposite reciprocal of that would be 1/m. When you multiply you'd still get -1
|dw:1439429888384:dw|
OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH because they're perpendicular they will automatically be a negative for the product!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
<333333 thank you
right :)
you're welcome
so B is greater
yes
thank u =)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!