Question

/

Answer 1

I am thinking

Answer 2

start from the inside and work your way out

j(2) = ?

Answer 3

right, so h(j(2)) = ?

Answer 4

I helped someone with this same exact problem a couple days ago.

Answer 5

h(j(2)) = h(-4) = ?

Answer 6

use whatever is inside the parentheses...

Answer 7

remember what you did for j(2)? h(-4) is just the same rule

Answer 8

I prefer to find h[j(x)] first

Answer 9

I don't want to take over. I just wanted to offer a different perspective. @Vocaloid finish explaining your approach.

Answer 10

alright then...

Answer 11

ok, so h(j(2)) means find j(2), and use j(2) as the x value in h(x)

Answer 12

-13 this answer

Answer 13

j(2) = -4, so h(j(2)) = h(-4)

Answer 14

h(-4) = ?

Answer 15

nope, not -7 or -11...

x = -4
h(x) = 3x - 1?

Answer 16

lol

Answer 17

i am sure about my answer mate