Find cube root of i Please, help
I am here to learn, I sux at this stuff. Something about a circle :)
|dw:1441159218311:dw|
take one third of that angle to find the first one the other two are evenly spaced around the circle
|dw:1441159323165:dw|
\[\frac{\sqrt3}{2}+\frac{1}{2}i\] is that one two more to go
geometry is awesome! you want to find a number which when cubed produces \(i\) : \[\large {(e^{i\theta})^3 = e^{i\frac{\pi}{2}}\\\implies 3\theta = \frac{\pi}{2}+2k\pi}\] you can solve \(\theta\)
notice the trick with exponents when we rise a complex number to a power, the argument(angle) simply gets multiplied by the power
Thanks for the guidance. Question: is there any link among the roots?
assume \[\sqrt[3]{i}=x+yi \\ \text{ cube both sides } i=(x+yi)^3 \\ i=x^3+(yi)^3+3x^2(yi)+3x(yi)^2 \\ i=x^3-3xy^2+3x^2yi-y^3i \\ \text{ so we have } x^3-3xy^2=0 \text{ and } 3x^2y-y^3=1 \\ \text{ assume } x \neq 0 \text{ so } x^2=3y^2 \text{ so the second equation can be written as } \\ 3(3y^2)y-y^3=1 \\ 9y^3-y^3=1 \\ 8y^3=1 \\ y=\frac{1}{2} \\ x^2=3(\frac{1}{2})^2 \\ x^2=\frac{3}{4} \\ \] \[x=\pm \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}\]
\[\sqrt[3]{i}=\pm \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} + \frac{1}{2} i\]
Easy to see that these nth roots add up to \(0\) is that the link you talking about ?
|dw:1441160623986:dw|
as you might know we can treat these literally same as vectors look at the geometry, they have symmetry, they must add up to 0
oh and I guess x=0 can be a solution to that one equation which makes \[-y^3=1 \\ \text{ so } y^3=-1 \\ \text{ so } y=-1 \text{ and so the last solution would be } x+yi=0-i =-i \]
My computer is .... crazy!! ok, I got sum of them =-i not 0, how?
i wouldn't know what you did to get -i haha must be some arithmetic error somewhere.. just double check :) but isn't the geometry so convincing ?
I use algebraic way
\[(\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}+\frac{1}{2}i)+(\frac{-\sqrt{3}}{2}+\frac{1}{2}i)+(0-i) \\ (\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}-\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}+0)+(\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}-1)i \]
^
Like what you said above the root is \(r = e^{i(\pi/6 + 2\pi n/3)}\) , where n = 0,1,2
replace n = 0, I get \(r_1 = e^{i\pi/6}=\sqrt{3}/2 + i/2\)
n =1 , \(r_2 = -\sqrt{3}/2 -i/2\) n =2 \(r_3 = -i\) sum of them =-i
I realize that @freckles has the same answer with mine.
your r_2 should be...
\[-\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}+\frac{i}{2} \text{ \right ? }\]
yeah the second root is in second quadrant so its imaginary component must be positive
\(r_2 = e^{i(\pi/6 + 2pi/3}= e^{i\pi/6}*e^{i2\pi/3} = (\sqrt {3}/2+i/2)*(cos 2pi/3 + isin2pi/3)\) \(=(\sqrt3/2+i/2)(-1/2+i\sqrt3/2)\) \(=-\sqrt3/4+i 3/4 -i/4 -\sqrt 3/4\) \(= -\sqrt3/2 +i/2\)
oh, yes, I got it =0. Man!! it drove me crazy!! Thanks you guys!!:)
Question: no matter what the result is, to test whether I can get it right or not, the sum of roots =0, right? just make sure. :)
wouldn't it be simpler to just add the exponents \(r_2 = e^{i(\pi/6 + 2pi/3}= e^{i5\pi/6} = \cos(5\pi/6)+i\sin(5\pi/6)\)
Yes, it is!! but my prof asked us to try many ways but geometry. hehehe..
geometry is only to convince you you cannot draw a picture and say "it is a proof"
To this stuff, the first step is geometry to define the arg z , right?
like: find the square root of 7-6i
We need geometry to define where it is and how to get the angle.
not really complex numbers form a field, we define complex number as an ordered pair \((a,b)\) and give it structure by defining other necessary operations
geometry helps in visualizing stuff it was not part of definition so strictly speaking you can totally avoid geometry
like you can say \[\sqrt{7-6i}=x+yi \\ \text{ sqaure both sides and then compare real and imagainry parts }\]
that is what I did to the previous one
above equation,\(\sqrt{~z~}=w\) is equivalent to \[7 = x^2-y^2\\-6 = 2xy\] so any equation in complex variable can be split as a system of equations of real variables
finding \(n\)th roots of a complex number is essentially same as solving a system of polynomial equations of degree \(n\) unless you take advantage of the geometry, finding nth roots is very difficult by hand as solving \(n\)th degree polynomial equations is a major pain
I got you. I have another problem. Let me post a new one.
Ha!! the net doesn't allow me to close this post. hehehe
the net or openstudy? :p
i can close it for you, one sec..
Let z = cis (2pi/n) for n > = 2 Show that 1 + z + ...+ z^(n-1) =0
n is an integer?
There are like dozens of proofs, il just give you my favorite and simple one
yes
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!