Explain this proof of polynomial congruences by George Andrews. I don't get where it says: "However p (not divide symbol) aₒ, and since the w_i are mutually incongruent, the difference between any two w_i is not divisible by p." How so? https://books.google.com/books?id=eVwvvwZeBf4C&lpg=PA58&pg=PA72#v=onepage&q&f=false
It's actually on the next page after you click on the link, but you might wanna read the proof first
I think it's saying, if a is incongruent b mod c, then c does not divide (a-b)
that is lagrange's theorem, one of the most important theorems in group theory
oh ok. But can you please explain the statement above? ^^
why doesn't p divide the difference of any of the two w_i? I was thinking it's true by definition
before explaining that, let me ask you a question from the same proof
ok
The proof use both induction and contradiction at the same time. I'm still trying to figure the general layout of the proof
did you get below part of the proof |dw:1441691724959:dw|
why must \(g(x)\) be congruent to \(0\) for "every" integer \(x\) ?
I think I did. But let me explain to see if I really did. But book first proved base cases for n = 0 and n = 1. Now it assumed that f(x) is a polynomial with k degree but with (k+1) mutually incongruent solutions
are you on windows/mac ?
IS that the induction step btw?
i'm on windows 7
inductive*
see if you can install teamviewer http://download.teamviewer.com/download/TeamViewer_Setup_en.exe
ok hold on
should I choose "basic installation" ?
just click next keeping whatever is default
installed. Let me enter your id
click on "Meeting" and enter below id m14-003-342
I think i'm in
I can hear you
Control panel?
I can see your screen now
am I supposed to turn on Microphone setting or something?
uh... how so?
I am supposed to connect a physical micrphone to my computer?
microphone*
degree of g(x) is less than k
so \(g(x)\) satisfies induction assumption but \(g(x)\) has \(k\) roots so it must be the case that ALL coefficients of \(g(x)\) are divisible by \(p\)
hold on, let me re-read the part that you posted
the w's are the roots of f(x) right?
\(w_1, w_2, \ldots, w_k, w_{k+1}\) satisfy \(f(x)\) \(w_1, w_2, \ldots, w_k\) satisfy \(g(x)\)
wait, how do w1, ..., wk satisfy g(x)??
right
oh ok, if you plug any value of w1, ..., wk, in for x, we get: g(x) = f(x), for all x of w1,...wk
right
ok, but what does g(x) = f(x) mean though? Does it mean g(x) ≡ f(x) (mod p) for all x of w1, ... ,wk?
oh ok.
\(f(x)=x^9 + 2x^3 \) \(g(x) = 8x^9 + 9x^3\) then \(f(x) \equiv g(x) \pmod 7\)
ok, so you're saying [(x^9 + 2x^3) - (8x^9 + 9x^3) ]/7 is an integer for some x
for all x?
[(x^9 + 2x^3) - (8x^9 + 9x^3) ]/7 is an integer for "every" x
let me simplify it using wolfram alpha to see. Hold on
oh, ok ^^
by assumption?
Induction assumption : every polynomial of degree \(n\) less than \(k\) has at most \(n\) incongruent solutions mod prime \(p\) \(g(x)\) satisfies induction assumption since degree is less than \(k\) also \(g(x)\) has \(k\) incongruent solutoins so it must be the case that ALL coefficients of \(g(x)\) are divisible by \(p\), why ?
what do yo mean by coefficients of g(x)? you mean the constants in front of the x's?
so you're saying g(x) congruent f(x) congruent 0 because the coefficients of g(x) are divisible by p?
g(x) congruent 0 for all x because the coefficients of g(x) are divisible by p
oh oh i see. You're saying g(x) congruent 0 (mod p) because the coefficients of g(x) are divisiple by p
uhm... I have no idea :D
you're asking why all the coeffient of g(x) are divisible by p
right
wait why does p | a_n ?
Induction assumption : If the degree of polynomial is \(n\) and if it is less than \(k\), then it has at most \(n\) incongruent solutions mod prime \(p\) provided \(p\nmid a_n\)
rigt
contrapostive?
consdier below conditional : If a quadrilateral has four right angles, and if all sides are equal, then it is a square
must be a rectangle?
oh
I think i'm starting to see what you're trying to get at.
there is some quadrilateral that you know that has four right angles and you also happen to know that it is a square what can you say about its sides
the sides must be equal?
you know that the degree of g(x) is less than k and you also happen to know that g(x) has "k" incongruent solutions what can you say about its leading coefficient ?
Induction assumption : If the degree of polynomial is \(n\) and if it is less than \(k\), then it has at most \(n\) incongruent solutions mod prime \(p\) provided \(p\nmid a_n\)
that p divides the leading coefficient. But let me confirm that IF A and B, then C Suppose A and ~C, then ~B right?
\((A\land B) \implies C \\\iff\\ (A\land \neg C) \implies \neg B\) ?
so what I said is correct? about A,B,C
so about the assumption: A = p divides leading coefficient B = f(x) has n degree C = f(x) has at most n incongruent solutions
p does not*
so about the assumption: A = p does not divide the leading coefficient B = g(x) has degree n which is less than k C = g(x) has at most n incongruent solutions
right g(x)
ok, so since g(x) has k-1 (which less than k), but it has k incongruent solutions, therefor P must divide the leading coefficient!
sorry, k-1 degree*
i don't know :D
since \(p\mid a_k\), \(g(x) \equiv 0x^{k}+a_{k-1}x^{k-1}+\cdots + a_1x+a_0 \\\equiv a_{k-1}x^{k-1}+\cdots + a_1x+a_0 \pmod{p}\)
since p | a_k, a_k congrent 0 (mod p) right
i'm still puzzled at why you replaced a_k with 0
why's that? what modulo law was used?
Sorry if I'm slow. Going from integer to polynomial is big jump for me XD
@ganeshie8
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!