Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 15 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

here

OpenStudy (anonymous):

In the finite complement topology of R, let the sequence [x_{n} be defined by x_{n} = n, for n\epsilon N. If the limit of the sequence is x, then x must be ∞ 0 A unique constant Arbitrary in R

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@zzr0ck3r

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what is the complement of R?

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

what is the set of all elements that are not in R For the 6th times, please stop using epsilon. IT DOES NOT MEAN IN

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i do not know

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i thought there are two types of numbers

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the imaginary and the real

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

when we talk about the real numbers as the universe, we do not consider them as a subset of the complex numbers. The compliment of the real numbers is the emptyset

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok. thanks so much

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so will that option b empty since is the complement of R?

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

In the cofinite topology, 1) a sequence that does not take an infinite many of the same value will converge to every element in the space. 2) A sequence that does(but only one number), will converge to that number 3) A sequence that has more than one number for which it obtains infinite times does not converge

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

So what is the answer?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Arbitrary in R

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

correct

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i wonder how \(\{ x_n,\varnothing ,R \}\) is considered cofinite :O

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what does arbitrary really mean. because i see it as finite or infinite

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

um, it means if you close your eye and pick one

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Arbitrary = any

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

@halmos? \(\{x_n, \emptyset, \mathbb{R}\}\) what is this?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

In the finite complement topology of R, let the sequence [x_{n} be defined by x_{n} = n was trying to interpret in notations

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

Arbitrary size means we are not given anything about the set, so as far as order, a set of arbitrary order is either finite or infinite. But we use the term this other way as well :)

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

he sucks with latex :)

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

he also usees \(\epsilon\) when he means \(\in\) so you got to be careful with that as well :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh i see now :)

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

Sorry @GIL.ojei I am just playing with you...

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

but seriously start using \(\in\) when you mean in. It is coded as `\(\in)`

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

\in

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

\(\epsilon\), in general, means a positive real number

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@GIL.ojei u can use this next time for math notations :) http://prntscr.com/8e7ekc and yes epsilon used to denote very small values

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thank u sir

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

or "arbitrarily small" positive number :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Let (X,τ) be a topological space, and let A be a subset of X. A is dense in X if and only if every non-empty open subset U of X, _________________ A⋂U=0 A⋃U=ϕ A⋂U=ϕ A⋂U=X

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

What is that weird symbol?

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

@GIL.ojei ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

this is just a definition, and i think the notation should be empty set u can use `\varnothing` \( \varnothing \) instead

OpenStudy (anonymous):

empty set

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

then what is the 0?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i think he copied it from a place which typed it as \(\emptyset \) first (we see it 0) then as \(\phi\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

its just zero

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

that makes no sense

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

It should be intuitively clear from the definition of a dense set, that if \(U\) is open then \(A\cap U\ne \emptyset\). But I do not see this option, and I dont know what the weird \(\phi \) looking thing is

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

or `\emptyset`

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

The union of any non empty set and anything else is non empty

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

these options don't make sense.

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

@GIL.ojei please reread the question and see if it shuold say \(\neq \emptyset\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Let (X,τ) be a topological space, and let A be a subset of X. A is dense in X if and only if every non-empty open subset U of X, _________________

OpenStudy (anonymous):

A⋂U=0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that is option a

OpenStudy (anonymous):

A⋃U=\[ϕ \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that is option b

OpenStudy (anonymous):

A⋂U=\[ϕ \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thats option C

OpenStudy (anonymous):

A⋂U=X

OpenStudy (anonymous):

option D

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@zzr0ck3r

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i think is option c

OpenStudy (anonymous):

or option D

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

option a makes no sense the union of subsets of some general topology are not necessarily equal to a number option b is wrong because U is non empty option c is wrong because of what I wrote about the non empty intersection option d is only true sometimes

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

\(A\cap U \neq \emptyset\) is always true

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Which of these is not true about T1 - spaces? a)Every singleton set is closed b)Every finite set is closed c)Every Hausdorff space is T1 d)Y1isinR

OpenStudy (anonymous):

this is the last question on topology for today. please, i will tell you what to teach me today . please

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i know option A and B are correct

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but what about C and D? i fink C is also correct

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

what does Y1isinR mean and why do you keep writing things like this?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that was how i saw it

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[Y_1 \] is in R

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

you look at the page and it looks like this ? Y1isinR ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i think that was what they wanted to write

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

what is \(Y_1\)?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

do not have idea but is Every Hausdorff space is T1?

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

Tell me the definitions of both

OpenStudy (anonymous):

X is a T1 space if any two distinct points in X are separated.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i know that Hausdorff space has to do with intersection. but what is really separated?

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

what does separated mean?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i asked the question

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

So if it is Hausdorff, then for all \(x,y\) we have open set \(O,U\) such that \(x\in O, y\in U, O\cap U=\emptyset\) Does this imply that there is a open set \(A\) that contains \(x\) and does not contain \(y\)? Does this imply that there is a open set \(B\) that contains \(y\) and does not contain \(x\)? IF the answer is yes, then we must be \(T_1\).

OpenStudy (anonymous):

waw. so, T1 space is also Hausdorff space

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

we are not showing that T1 is Hausdorff, we are showing that Hausdorff is T1.

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

every horse has 4 legs but not every 4 legged animal is a horse i.e. if a implies b it is not necessarily true that b implies a

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i want to close the tab and open another. i think there are thinks i want to understand

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!