The width of a rectangle is 6 in. less than its length. The perimeter is 68 in. What is the width of the rectangle? in.
Hi pooja.
Uh i think the answer is in the question....if im right
divide it in two first
|dw:1442028600183:dw|
Omg I forgot the shapes have the "fill" option.... anyway.
yeah
When you say divide two first, do you mean 68 ÷ 2 and 6÷ 2
no 68 by 2
then subtract 6 from that
okay, that is 34...
the length of the rectangle is given, but they say the `width` `is (equal to)` the `length - 6 in`You can rewrite this as \(\sf w = L-6\)
So the Perimeter of a rectangle is represented as: \[\sf P = 2L +2W\]
Since we're given the perimeter, and that is = 68 in. we can substitute that in to our formula. \[\sf 68 = 2L +2W\]
But we also know something else, \(\sf W=L-6\)
68 - 6?
So we can substitute this in to the formula for the perimeter. \[\sf 68 = 2L+2(L-6)\]
Are you following, @gabbyalicorn ?
Um, somewhat... I don't really get it but i'm following the steps if that's what you mean. :)
Which part are you confused with? Let's clarify that before moving on.
is L the variable we are trying to find
the number for...
We are trying to find W (width). The problem indiscreetly gives us the equation for the width by saying that the width IS 6 LESS THAN the length. We can write an equation for that. \(\sf w = L-6\)
but what is L
But we can't automatically find the width, \(\sf w\) can we? We need to find the length, \(\sf L\) first.
That is where we use the equation for the perimeter of the rectangle. \(\sf P = 2L +2w\)
Do you see how this works?
I think I'm getting it...
Okay, so we have \[\sf 68 = 2L+2(L-6)\] We need to first distribute (meaning multiply) 2 to each term inside the parenthesis. \[2 \cdot L =~?\]\[2\cdot (-6) =~?\]
|dw:1442029733818:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!