Ask
your own question, for FREE!
Calculus1
4 Online
F(x)=ln(x) g(x)=e^x+1. F(g(x)) must then be ln(e^x+1) right? Can you simplify this?
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
is that e^(x+1) ?
e^x and ln(x) are inverse functions so: \[\ln(e^x) = x\]
yes you are right
No, g(x) is just e^x+1, as if it was 1+e^x without any parenthesis
\[f(g(x))= \ln(e ^{x}+1)\]
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
let me know if u need furthur help :)
oh btw you cant simplify further
or maybe write Near x=0, I suppose you could expand e^x,
because ln(1) = 0 and also ln(e^x) is also 0 because they are inverse pairs
So that makes it x+1 in the end. But the reverse, g(f(x)) = e^ln(x)+1 will also become x+1? Right?
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Ah, ok :)
|dw:1442478053901:dw|
Can't find your answer?
Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Latest Questions
DoltonCarlee:
what are y'all's options on S A T essays because honestly their not that bad
thereneelg:
Can someone give me a summary of article 231, The war guilt clause?? I need to explain what it is, but I can't find any shortened version of what it is and
luisaam2:
What should you do when the person you want to talk to the most is the one making
Breathless:
https://medal.tv/games/roblox/clips/nAYivIl6oXB6q9QAI?invite=cr-MSxCSk4sMTY4OTA4N
Twaylor:
I'm not that good at law can someone fact check this without bias? June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court decided Chatrie v.
Demon25:
For a hoco proposal with a cheerleader and football player, what else should be a
10 hours ago
4 Replies
2 Medals
1 day ago
7 Replies
1 Medal
15 hours ago
16 Replies
1 Medal
1 week ago
0 Replies
0 Medals
1 week ago
0 Replies
0 Medals
1 week ago
12 Replies
0 Medals