Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 17 Online
Parth (parthkohli):

Physics...

Parth (parthkohli):

@imqwerty

Parth (parthkohli):

OK, so I have a really specific question. Whenever we study circular motion and aspects of circular motion, I see some solutions including the extra rotational kinetic energy when applying the work-energy theorem and some don't do that. When is it OK to not include the rotational kinetic energy?

Parth (parthkohli):

I'll do a followup question as an example to explain why I'm confused here.

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

If I remember correctly, work-energy theorem is like universal... it works for all kinds of forces; It doesn't matther if the forces are conservative or not. Conservation of energy requires the forces to be conservative, though.

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Could you provide examples to contrast where rotational kinetic energy is included/excluded in work energy equation

Parth (parthkohli):

This isn't the real question yet, but here's where the confusion arises.|dw:1443076050348:dw|\[mgL = \frac{1}{2}mv^2\tag{1} \]\[mgL = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 + \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2 = \frac{1}{2}mL^2 \frac{v^2}{L^2} = mv^2\tag{2}\]I think \(\tag 1\) is wrong and \(\tag 2\) is right.

Parth (parthkohli):

|dw:1443076205726:dw|

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!