If a stock gains 50 percent one year and loses 50 percent of its value the next year, is it accurate to say that its mean growth over the full two-year period was (50 + -50)/2 = 0%?
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
no
OpenStudy (anonymous):
suppose it is worth $100 and increases by 50%
what is it worth now?`
OpenStudy (anonymous):
@satellite73 200?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
no that is a 100% increase
what is 50% of 100?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
@satellite73 50? So would you add 50 to 100 and the total would be 150?
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
yes
OpenStudy (misty1212):
HI!!
OpenStudy (misty1212):
if it is now worth $150 and decreases by 50% which is by half, what is it worth now?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
@misty1212 75?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
yup
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
so it is not 0 as an average, it has lost 25% of its value
OpenStudy (anonymous):
the math teacher way is \[1.50\times .50=0.75\]
OpenStudy (anonymous):
so it has 75% of its initial value
OpenStudy (misty1212):
which is the same as saying it lost 25%!
OpenStudy (anonymous):
@misty1212 @satellite73 Awesome!! Thank you so much. That makes much more sense. I appreciate it
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!