Ask your own question, for FREE!
Discrete Math 16 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

is there a more discrete math way to answer this? attachment in reply

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (amistre64):

given the sets x,y,z let x= {1,2,3,4} let y = {2,3,5,6} let z = {3,4,5,7} if we add them up with no regard for thier intersections, we are 'duplicating' the data. (1+2+3+4)+(2+3+5+6)+(3+4+5+7) we need to adjust it to get an accurate account, subtract the intersections xy, xz, yz (1+2+3+4)+(2+3+5+6)+(3+4+5+7) -(2+3) -(3+4) -(3+5) what we have done is; 2+2-2, 4+4-4, 5+5-5, and 3+3+3 -3-3-3 the 2,4,5 have been taken care of so that they are counted once ... but we have completly eliminated the 3s ... add back in the intersection xyz .... (1+2+3+4)+(2+3+5+6)+(3+4+5+7) -(2+3) -(3+4) -(3+5) +(3) now everything is accounted for and there is no duplication of the data.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!