Use the empirical rule (68-95-99.7) to determine if the following maximum daily rainfall totals could be considered to be normally distributed. 1.1, 1.2, 1.5, 1.55, 1.71, 1.75, 1.9, 1.94, 1.99, 2.0, 2.05, 2.08, 2.12, 2.18, 2.2, 2.25, 2.36, 2.5, 2.61, 2.81, 2.88, 2.95, 3.0, 3.03, 3.07, 3.16, 3.25, 3.62. please help I don't understand this problem at all
well, i would assume we want to start with the mean and standard deviation of the set
so the mean is 2.3 and the standard deviation would be 2.9, I think? @amistre64
{1.1, 1.2, 1.5, 1.55, 1.71, 1.75, 1.9, 1.94, 1.99, 2.0, 2.05, 2.08, 2.12, 2.18, 2.2, 2.25, 2.36, 2.5, 2.61, 2.81, 2.88, 2.95, 3.0, 3.03, 3.07, 3.16, 3.25, 3.62} mean of 2.3 is fine .. but your deviation is off according to the wolf
mean +- 1sd gives us the normal spread about the mean for 68% of the data. +- 2 sd and +- 3 sd give us the spreads for the other rule parts. I would say that if that much of the data is approximately in the spread, then its good
when i graphed it out as a normal distribution on a graphing calculator, it looked like a normal distribution. So because most values are grouped around the mean, in the 68% would be explaing that the data is a normal distribution?
@Amistre64
im not sure about that approach, but then im not grading it. 'it looks like' is not a very sound approach to me.
in a normal distribution, approximatly 68% of the data is within 1 standard deviation of the mean ... i do not see that process being done very well by 'it looks like'
I just can't think of any other way to explain how to use the 68,95,99.7 empirical rule to explain if a set of data is normally distributed. @amistre64
1.1, 1.2, 1.5, 1.55, 1.71, 1.75, 1.9, 1.94, 1.99, 2.0, 2.05, 2.08, 2.12, 2.18, 2.2, 2.25, mean = 2.3 or so sd = .64 or something like it 2.36, 2.5, 2.61, 2.81, 2.88, 2.95, 3.0, 3.03, 3.07, 3.16, 3.25, 3.62 mean +- 1 sd 2.3 + .64 = 2.97 2.3 - .64 = 1.66 1.71, 1.75, 1.9, 1.94, 1.99, 2.0, 2.05, 2.08, 2.12, 2.18, 2.2, 2.25, 2.36, 2.5, 2.61, 2.81, 2.88, 2.95 18 out of 28 = 18/28 = .6428, or about 64.3% of the data, which may be close enough to 68% for comparisons. try it at +- 2sd and see what you get
the only way i can see to use the rule, is to define how much data lies within the required number of standard deviations ....
it looks like almost all the data except for one value is between -2 and 2 or at least that's what im getting. @amistre64
youve got 28 data points .68(28) = 19.04, so about 19 or 20 data points should be about the mean within +-1 sd .95(28) = 26.6, so about 26 or 27 data points should be about the mean within +- 2 sd etc ...
1.472 to 3.58 1.5, 1.55, 1.71, 1.75, 1.9, 1.94, 1.99, 2.0, 2.05, 2.08, 2.12, 2.18, 2.2, 2.25, 2.36, 2.5, 2.61, 2.81, 2.88, 2.95, 3.0, 3.03, 3.07, 3.16, 3.25 25 data points, is close to 26 or 27 yes
assuming the mean and sd chosen is appropriate :)
okay thank you so much that makes much better sense than what i was thinking it was saying :) @amistre64
youre welcome :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!