Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 9 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

The function g(x) is a continuous quadratic function defined for all real numbers, with some of its values given by the table below. The quadrative function f(x) is represented by the parabola below, Select all the statements that are true. The function f(x) has a maximum value at x=4.5. The function g(x) has a minimum value of 0. The maximum value of g(x) is twice the maximum value of f(x). Neither function have a minimum value.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@563blackghost @amistre64 @mathmate @CGGURUMANJUNATH @Michele_Laino

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@jango_IN_DTOWN @FrostFlare23 @Ghostgate

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@mathstudent55 @FibonacciChick666

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@zepdrix @zasharra

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

alright, let us play the claim/isit true game

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

The function f(x) has a maximum value at x=4.5. Is it true?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

really? At \(\color\red{x=4.5}\)?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh wait nvm

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

ok, so do you see where you made your mistake for that one?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes..

OpenStudy (anonymous):

This question I got somewhat right

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

alright so second claim, The function g(x) has a minimum value of 0. (i am going to assume they mean absolute minimum here and not relative) Is this true?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I put down b and c

OpenStudy (anonymous):

And got part of it right

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

I agree with c

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so c and d

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

well, why d?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So each has a maximum no minimum

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

why? how can you support that claim?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Well f(x) has y=4.5 pointed up for maximum.

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

I'll take that as good enough

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

for maximum that is

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

and when you say pointed up, you should really use concave instead

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

concave down* sorry

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

but I really just want you to convince me on the minimum part

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I got the question right after you explained it @FibonacciChick666

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

uh, np, but you should prove at least to yourself why they have no minimums. Especially since if we restrict g(x) to −3<x<200 we will have a minimum

OpenStudy (jango_in_dtown):

only option C is correct.@Austin1617

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!