Question

Which of the following describes an advantage primary sources have over secondary sources for a historian?

A. They can help a historian focus on important themes rather than on a specific piece of evidence.
B. They can summarize a huge amount of data that a historian could not sort through alone.
C. They can compare and contrast conclusions other historians have made about a time period.
D. They can reveal how individuals experiencing historical events actually reacted.

Answer 1

what do you think it is

Answer 2

I would go with a due to the fact that secondary sources come form people writing about what they read in primary sources

Answer 3

im not sure which one tho

Answer 4

yeah this one is har d

Answer 5

im not sure whats your guess

Answer 6

umm A or B

Answer 7

Your score is 30% (6.0 points out of 20).

Answer 8

lol that shows you how much i no about this stuff.

Answer 9

its okay

Answer 10

lol i guess