How exactly can I tell a series with different index equals another series, could I just plug in numbers?
For example I was working on a DE yesterday, but I was not exactly sure why this is true, \[\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} a_nn(n-1)x^{n} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_nn(n-1)x^{n} \] it's more the a_n that confuses me.
@amistre64 @jim_thompson5910 @IrishBoy123
astro i personally would just plug them in. i am not sure, however, that that is how you are "supposed" to do it. hope this finds you well 😊
You can see that everything is the same, except for two missing terms of n=0 and n=1, \[\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} a_nn(n-1)x^{n} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_nn(n-1)x^{n} \] So to prove that, you can pull out the first 2 terms of the sum on the right: \[\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} a_nn(n-1)x^{n} = a_0 0(0-1) + a_1(1(1-1))+ \sum_{n=2}^{\infty} a_nn(n-1)x^{n} \] Now wait, these two sums are the same, so we can remove them by subtracting from both sides: \[0= a_0 0(0-1) + a_1(1(1-1))\] Ok, so now we're left with this, which is I think a pretty clearly true statement, so it's all true.
Oooooh I think I get it, so we can start at n = 0 because when you get to n=2 it's just the same sum, as the n= 0 and n = 1 go to 0 anyways, ahh I hope I said that correctly! Thanks man! Thanks to @IrishBoy123 as well
Yeah exactly, those two contributing terms are just 0, so adding 0 never changed nuffin' :P
That makes so much sense haha
Don't say that, this is diffy Q it's not supposed to make sense r u outta ur mind?!
|dw:1446682442924:dw|
@AloneS
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!