The cable of the 1700 kg elevator cab shown the figure snaps when the cab is at rest at the first floor, where the cab bottom is a distance d = 4.6 m above a spring of spring constant k = 0.12 MN/m. A safety device clamps the cab against guide rails so that a constant frictional force of 4.6 kN opposes the cab's motion. (Assume that the frictional force on the cab is negligible when the cab is stationary.) A) Find the speed of the cab right before it hits the spring B)Find the maximum distance x that the spring is compressed (frictional force still acts during compression)
C) Find the total distance the cab will bounce back up the shaft D)Using conservation of energy, find the approximate total distance the cab will move before coming to rest.
@freckles
@IrishBoy123
I'm having a hard time guys I got part A it's 8.08m/s
I found B. x=1.07m
I got C. It goes up 3.23m
I just found the solution to this problem only with different numbers, but I don't understand what they're doing for the last part. I'll post so you can see maybe you'll be able to understand.
http://www.slader.com/textbook/9781118230718-fundamentals-of-physics-10th-edition/207/problems/63/
Want me to post how I got those answers?
ok I think I found some formulas... and I'm guessing g=9.8 something is a given like some kind of kinetic energy thingy
we're supposed to know g so yes
I'm trying something right now It's gonna take forever but I think I'll be able to find the total distance
Going to copy and paste your problem here so I don't have to scroll up when typing this: The cable of the 1700 kg elevator cab shown the figure snaps when the cab is at rest at the first floor, where the cab bottom is a distance d = 4.6 m above a spring of spring constant k = 0.12 MN/m. A safety device clamps the cab against guide rails so that a constant frictional force of 4.6 kN opposes the cab's motion. (Assume that the frictional force on the cab is negligible when the cab is stationary.) \[m=1700 kg \\ d=4.6 m \\ k=0.12 \cdot 10^{6} \frac{N}{m} \\F_f=4.6 \cdot 10^{3} N \\ d_{eq}=\frac{ m \cdot g}{k}=\frac{1700 \cdot 9.8}{0.12 \cdot 10^{6}}=0.1388 \overline{3} \text{ or } \frac{833}{6000} \approx 0.1388 \\ \\ d_{eq} \text{ is the distance the spring is compressed when the cab comes to rest } \] \[m \cdot g \cdot (d+d_{eq})=F_f \cdot D_{total } \] should plug in the numbers and solve for distance total which is D_(total)
I just finished the really long way I told you about and got 16.7 which is correct when you plug in all the numbers for yours do you get the same? I'm curious
I got 17 but it asks for an approximation so that is right. Mine is exact lol took about 20min.
that means something is off about that one formula and that this other formula I have is right because the first one I got 17.something and this other one I got 16.9
what's the formula that gave you 16.9?
\[m \cdot g (d_{eq}+d)=\frac{1}{2} k \cdot d_{eq}^2+F_f \cdot D_{total }\]
for some reason this one site as the 1/2*k*d_eq^2 thingy while this one doesn't
but there is another mistake in this one site
http://www.myfavoritetutor.net/conservation-of-energy-1/ http://www.dhouts.com/unit_2_slns.pdf
I thought the explanation on that first site was better but I think that there is mistakes on the first site
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CCQQFjABahUKEwibsv_MxPjIAhWDSiYKHVF4D9Q&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dhouts.com%2Funit_2_slns.pdf&usg=AFQjCNEdFoFK3PmjBS0mr5F87u2habJQVA just in case second one doesn't work
for example on that first site they said k=.15*10^(-6) N/m instead of .15*10^6 N/m
The 2nd one works. Now how did you know Deq was mg/k??
That's an equation I wasn't given in class is why I ask.
that is what the first site explains does spring force+frictional force-gravitational force=0 mean anything to you?
that Deq=mg/k is what we get if we assume the frictional force is 0
which is when the cab is going nowhere
Sounds like a modification of the formulas I know. Usually we say -frictional force
That makes perfect sense
well in all honesty I know nothing about physics I just look up formulas and plug in numbers :p I guess some of it makes sense though
LMFAO
Dude your pretty smart if your figuring out physics problems and haven't been taught physics.
You have to be really good at math I'm impressed freckles you have a degree?
I do have a math degree with no physics background whatsoever. If I can find a formula, I think I can help you... I might not be so good on the explanation part of it though .
That explains it, physics is just applied math and you seem to be able to understand the formulas really well. I can't wait till i'm at your level of intellect freckles Thanks for your help man I appreciate it.
How do i give you a medal?
lol... You don't have to but normally there is a best response button.
Oh that's it? just gave you one.
I will give you one for all your hard work and effort you had put into before I got here. And also I'm really not that smart. Getting a degree just made me feel how dumb I really am. :p Like there is so much math and I do not know it all.
best response=medal
good to know and i agree hopefully by the time i'm 45 i'll be well rounded in every subject i want to be near expert level in the math and sciences
I have already accepted I will never be good in the language/english studies
Maybe okay... but not great.
lol same here
Don't get to 45 too fast! Goodnight.
night man thanks again and i'm not gonna close this question because i want to come back to it later.
also I'm not a man
but I know what you mean man :p
I love meeting women that are smarter than i am
lol
have a good evening now rest well
I don't know if I'm smarter than you.
you too
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!