do you see it?
The following operations are permitted with the quadratic polynomial: \(ax^2 + bx + c\): (a) switch \(a\) and \(c\), (b) replace \(x\) by \(x+t\) where \(t\) is any real number. Can we transform \(x^2 - x - 2\) into \(x^2 - x - 1\)?
Another one. I'm finally able to solve problems like these. Each of the numbers \(1\) to \(10^6\) is repeatedly replaced by its digital sum until we reach \(10^6\) one-digit numbers. Will these have more 1’s or 2’s?
the first one is basically a comparison.. right?
i dont see it :( there only two ways to do it, switch a, c first or and then shift by 't', or the other way round, either case, i cant see any solution
if we have any equation and we transform it for example if we have this- ax^2 +bx+c 1st step we get this- cx^2+bx+a the coefficient of x^2 can never change even when we proceed for the 2nd step i.e., (x+t) so a of the equation x^2-x-1 is positive so it will be upwrd facing when u transform the equation x^2-x-2 the 1st step u get this- -2x^2-x+1 the a of this equation will always be -2 i.e., it will always be negative so it will be downwrd facing so we can't transform it like that
My proof is this: in either steps, the discriminant remains the same.
omg yes xD
i dont get it...so what if the discriminant remains the same?
Then the initial and final discriminant must be the same.
ah..your saying the the given polynomials have different discriminats, and D before/after transformation is the same
When you say "a and c" does this represent a valid transformation: \[ax^2+bx+bt+c \to (bt+c)x^2+bx+a\]
erm, ok whatever I left out shifting the x^2 but you get the question
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!