Show that (n-7)/(n+7) converges with the limit 1. When n goes from 1 to infinity.
Does it make sense to split it up into two: \[\frac{ n }{ n+7 }\] and \[\frac{ -7 }{ n+7 }\]
good idea, just try splitting it in another way
How about : \(\dfrac{n-7}{n+7} = \dfrac{(n+7)-14}{n+7} = 1 -\dfrac{14}{n+7}\)
Yes, that is a great idea. Now i should be able to insert it in the definition for convergence.
Yes, remember \(\lim\limits_{n\to\infty} \dfrac{1}{n} = 0\)
wait a second, are you supposed to prove this using epsilon delta definition of limit ?
No, we have only learned the definition for convergence, and cauchy.
then we're good i hope :)
I insert it with the limit:\[|1-\frac{ 14 }{ n+7 }-1|=|-\frac{ 14 }{ n+7 }|=\frac{ 14 }{ n+7 }\] Now this needs to be less or equal to epislon. Can I do the following: \[\frac{ 14 }{ n+7 }\le \frac{ 1 }{ n }\le \epsilon\]
Because if i get it to \[\frac{ 1 }{ n }\], then i can isolate n: \[n \ge \frac{ 1 }{ \epsilon }\] And get that if a natural number N is bigger than \[\frac{ 1 }{ \epsilon }\] then the function is convergent for all \[n \ge N\]
so you do want to prove it using epsilong delta definition !
\[\frac{ 14 }{ n+7 }\le \frac{ 1 }{ n }\le \epsilon\] this is wrong, try again.
Ohh, that is epsilon delta definition. I didnt know that, all my courses and stuff is on another language.
Yea, i realize that, is there anyway that I can get to \[\frac{ 1 }{ n }\]
dont get attached to \(\dfrac{1}{n}\) so much
you cuold try somehting like this : \[\frac{ 14 }{ n+7 }\lt \frac{ 14 }{ n }\lt \epsilon\] so we want \(n\gt \dfrac{14}{\epsilon}\)
Now you're ready to start the proof
what we did so far is just the scratch work, its not proof ok
your proof must start with the value of \(N\) that works
Ohh, i thought that was the proof.
Yea, but \[n>14/epsilon\] shows that for any number \[N>14/epsilon\], then \[|1-\frac{ 14 }{ n+7 }-1|\le \epsilon\] be true for all \[n >= N\]
I'm pretty sure, thats how they do in my books.
you're right, but you need to put that in proper order in your proof
if psble, may i see your complete proof ?
Well, the problem is that it is in Danish, and I am not great at english and dont know how to make a proof in english
thats okay :) please take a look at 2nd example here : http://www.millersville.edu/~bikenaga/math-proof/limits-at-infinity/limits-at-infinity.html
your final proof must have that structure
I will look at it, thanks
np :)
At the start my book lets epsilon > 0, and then they do the "scratch work", and then they kinda concludes that it is convergent.
The only thing I havent seen / I dont understand is where they set M=max()
Hi
Hello
GM
@ganeshie8 When they use M, is that the N\[N \le n\] that I have been using?
Yes M is same as N
How old are yall
you may simply let \(M = \dfrac{14}{\epsilon}\) in our case forget about \(M = \max(0, \dfrac{14}{\epsilon})\) if it confuses you now..
How old are yall
for our probloem, it shouldn't matter either ways
Okay, thank you soo much! You are great :)
Okay I let y'all go
Bye
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!