Quadrilateral ABCD in the figure below represents a scaled-down model of a walkway around a historic site. Quadrilateral EFGH represents the actual walkway. ABCD is similar to EFGH. http://prntscr.com/96m363 What is the total length, in feet, of the actual walkway?
@jim_thompson5910
you need to find these segment lengths: FG GH HE then add up all the sides of the larger figure
and how do I find those?
by setting up ratios after using the fact that EFGH ~ ABCD so for instance EF/AB = FG/BC 45/5 = x/4 x = ???
we'd cross multiply, right?
yes
okay, so 45*4 = 180 then 180 / 5 = x so x = 36?
yep
FG = 36
and how do we set up the rest? I can do the math for it, but setting them up confuses me.
if you're wondering as to how I set up EF/AB = FG/BC from EFGH ~ ABCD take note of the letters highlighted in red this similarity statement \[\Large \color{red}{\text{EF}}\text{GH} \sim \color{red}{\text{AB}}\text{CD}\] forms this ratio \[\Large \frac{\color{red}{\text{EF}}}{\color{red}{\text{AB}}} = \frac{\text{FG}}{\text{BC}}\] they are the first pair of letters in EFGH and ABCD respectively ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Now look at the blue letters highlighted this similarity statement \[\Large \text{E}\color{blue}{\text{FG}}\text{H} \sim \text{A}\color{blue}{\text{BC}}\text{D}\] forms this ratio \[\Large \frac{\text{EF}}{\text{AB}} = \frac{\color{blue}{\text{FG}}}{\color{blue}{\text{BC}}}\] now we're looking at the middle pair of letters for each EFGH and ABCD
let me know if that makes sense or not
Okay, so to form one for GH, which we need to find... We could use CD / GH and BC / FG?
Now look at the purple letters highlighted \[\Large \text{EF}\color{purple}{\text{GH}} \sim \text{AB}\color{purple}{\text{CD}} \rightarrow \frac{\text{EF}}{\text{AB}} = \frac{\color{purple}{\text{GH}}}{\color{purple}{\text{CD}}}\] we're looking at the last two letters for each EFGH and ABCD
We keep the EF / AB for all of them? Just change out the last one?
since EF is the only thing known about EFGH, it makes sense to keep EF so keep EF/AB
okay, so the one for GH would look like this: 45 / 5 = x / 4? which would give you the same value for GH as we had for FG?
sure after we discover what FG, GH, etc are, we can use other ratios on the left side. But the path of least resistance in my opinion is to keep EF/AB
yes now solve `45 / 5 = x / 4` to get x = 36 FG = 36 GH = 36
FG = GH makes sense because BC = CD = 4
and for HE, it would look like this: 45 / 5 = x / 3?
yep you got it
which would be 45 * 3 = 135 135 / 5 = x x = 27 so HE = 27
then we add the 36 + 36 + 27 together and that's the final answer, the total for the entire 'walkway'?
don't forget about EF
Oh, I didn't remember that lol So EF would look like this: 45 / 5 = x / 5 45*5 = 227 227 / 5 = 45 so EF = 45?
because EF corresponds to AB
EF is already known (it's shown on the figure as 45) there's no need to solve for what is already known
I guess I just like doing the math way too much lol sorry so then 36 + 36 + 27 + 45 would give us the total answer? which would be 144?
hey nothing wrong with that lol yes EF + FG + GH + HE = 45 + 36 + 36 + 27 = 144
okay, great! that was actually kind of fun lol thanks :)
I'm glad it makes more sense. You're welcome
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!