Ask your own question, for FREE!
Chemistry 14 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Help please? http://oi64.tinypic.com/19sb36.jpg

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Which equation will you have to reverse so that the reactants will be the same as in the equation you have to solve for?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Would it be the 3rd one?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Since there is an O2 at the end

OpenStudy (photon336):

one you definitely need to reverse, the third reaction though is a bit strange \[O_{2g} \rightarrow 2O_{g}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Let's first work with the first 2 reactions.

OpenStudy (photon336):

\[NO_{2g} + O_{2} \rightarrow NO_{g} + O_{3g} \]

OpenStudy (photon336):

Why did I do this? and what happens to the enthalpy sign

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The 3rd one is throwing me off because 2O is not in the equation you need to solve for, also the 2O(g) can't be cancelled out. The equation you need to solve for has 2NO2 on the reactant side and 2NO on the product side, so one reaction needs to be reversed.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You want certain ones to cancel out and to have products and reactants where they need to be for the last one. When you reverse it you change the sign of the delta heat.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@photon336 The enthalpy becomes positive

OpenStudy (photon336):

\[2(O_{3g} \rightarrow \frac{ 3 }{ 2 }O_{2} , (\Delta H = -142 \frac{ kj }{ mol })) = 2O_{3} \rightarrow 3O_{2}, \Delta H -284 \frac{ kj }{ mol }\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Where did the -284 come from?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh. Never mind. I see now.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

photon336 multiplied the 2nd equation as well. so it is -142.3*2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I see. Thank you

OpenStudy (photon336):

\[2NO_{2} + 2O_{2} \rightarrow 2NO + 2O_{3}, \Delta H, +396 \frac{ kj }{ mol }\]

OpenStudy (photon336):

hey @staldk3 do you get why @LeibyStrauss and I flipped the first reaction and multiplied everything by 2?>

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You multiplied so that you got rid of the fraction.

OpenStudy (photon336):

yep, and why did I flip the first one?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So the reactants/products will match the same sides as the one we are solving for.

OpenStudy (photon336):

cool, now last step we just need to see what happens when we combine both of the reactions that we did before

OpenStudy (photon336):

\[2O_{3} \rightarrow 3O_{2}\] \[2NO_{2} +2O_{2} \rightarrow 2NO + 2O_{3}\] So we have \[2NO_{2} \rightarrow 2NO + O_{2}\]

OpenStudy (photon336):

if you notice that O3 are in the reactants and product side they cancel out

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I was just looking at that actually.

OpenStudy (photon336):

@staldk3 to find the total enthalpy what do you think we need to do?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Why isn't the 3 carried over?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

add them all together and change the signs of the ones that got reversed.

OpenStudy (photon336):

we have 3 moles of O2 on the product side and 2 moles on the reactant side

OpenStudy (photon336):

so we're left with one mole on the product side of O2

OpenStudy (photon336):

Here's what we got from the first two reactions. we need to add these up in the end. but ask yourself how did I come to get these numbers? \[\Delta H_{1} = -284 \frac{ kj }{ mol}\] \[\Delta H_{2} = +396 \frac{ kj }{ mol }\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The first one you got it by multiply by 2

OpenStudy (photon336):

yep but we also flipped the reaction too. so when we do that we change the sign of the enthalpy.

OpenStudy (photon336):

what about the second one how did I get +396?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Unsure about that one

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh you did the same. You multiplied the -198 by 2

OpenStudy (photon336):

yes

OpenStudy (photon336):

so the goal of this now is we can combine both these two reactions to get the final answer

OpenStudy (photon336):

and we always add up the enthalpies from each step to get the total entlahpy of reaction

OpenStudy (anonymous):

112

OpenStudy (photon336):

you get this whole thing right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm getting it better. I don't really understand the point of all of it

OpenStudy (photon336):

think of it this way. You need to figure out the enthalpy of reaction for the total reaction and your given two separate reactions. You need to reverse the reactions as necessary and balance them. and then add them up to get the final equation when needed.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok

OpenStudy (photon336):

Take a look at this and show me what you see. this is everything I did for this problem. 2(O3g→32O2,(ΔH=−142kjmol))=2O3→3O2,ΔH−284kjmol 2NO2+2O2→2NO+2O3,ΔH,+396kjmol Then I combined both of these reactions 2O3→3O2 2NO2+2O2→2NO+2O3 So we have this: |dw:1448512848943:dw|

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I get the canceling out. So to pick the one that needs to be reversed it needs to be able to match what you're looking for?

OpenStudy (photon336):

yep

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Can you ever have more than one to reverse?

OpenStudy (photon336):

it depends on the reactions you're given. sometimes you'll just have to reverse one sometimes both. but when you do this both reactions must give you the reaction they are asking you for.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

And you still change the sign of the delta heat?

OpenStudy (photon336):

whenever you change the direction of the reaction you change delta H too

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Alright. Thanks

OpenStudy (photon336):

no problem

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!