Show that :
\[\Large \int\limits_0^\infty \frac{\sin \alpha \cos \alpha x}{\alpha} d \alpha\] = pi/2 when x=0 to 1 =pi/4 when x=1 =0 when x>1
I think we can do something with fourier transform on right side and then perform its inverse to show this..not quite sure.
@ganeshie8 @Jemurray3
@Kainui @dan815
I dunno, I tried taking the derivative with respect to x to see if that helped, but then kinda didn't get anywhere very far
This question is from Fourier Transformation in my textbook.
Oh then you should probably try using the convolution theorem if you can
Can't we take the fourier transform of the RHS to get a function of (say) alpha and then perform the inverse transformation?
what do you mean by right hand side?
Ok I think I see sorta what you're saying, like you wanna do a Fourier transform on this? \[\Large F(x)= \int\limits_0^\infty \frac{\sin \alpha \cos( \alpha x)}{\alpha} d \alpha\]
\[\Large \int\limits_0^1 \frac{\pi}{4}e^{-i \alpha x} dx\] + so on..and then do the inverse thing to get the same thing as LHS.
I mean there was a similar example in my book where they did this.^
I'm not that familiar with doing Fourier transforms, generally when I've used them I just plugged into wolfram alpha since it was faster than looking it up in a table or whatever unfortunately.
It's useful to note that \[\sin(x)\cos(y) = \frac{1}{2} \left(\sin(x+y) + \sin(x-y)\right)\] So that integral is equivalent to \[F(x) =\frac{1}{2} \int_0^\infty \frac{\sin[\alpha(x+1)]}{\alpha} + \frac{\sin[\alpha(1-x)]}{\alpha} d\alpha \equiv \frac{1}{2}\left(F_1(x) + F_2(x)\right)\] Each one of those integrals can be evaluated without too much of a problem. \[F_1(x) = \int_0^\infty \frac{\sin[\alpha(1+x)]}{\alpha} d\alpha \] Changing variables to \[ u=\alpha(1+x)\] we find \[F_1(x) = \int_0^\infty \frac{\sin(u)}{u} du = \frac{\pi}{2}\] \(F_2(x)\) is similar. If 0<x<1, the integration will be identical. If x=1, \(F_2\) will be equal to zero. if x > 1, you'll get an extra minus sign, so \(F_2 = -F_1\). You can check that this is exactly what you're looking for. Additionally, if you flip the sign of x, everything will be the same.
nice :o you didn't use fourier though :P
Why would that be necessary? Anytime you have sines and cosines you can transform to exponentials and that's more or less a Fourier transform. Additionally, the entire thing can be viewed as the real part of the Fourier transform \[F(x) = \frac{1}{2} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{\sin(\alpha)}{\alpha} e^{-i\alpha x} d\alpha \] but it's important to note that unlike what I did in your previous problem, differentiation with respect to x is no longer allowed. More work is required, and unless you know how to do contour integrals in the complex plane, you'd end up doing some variation of what I already did above.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!