Can someone look over my work?
1. https://gyazo.com/0be194cb26fc09186e456b3040ae26bd 2. https://gyazo.com/8b9838a8f395e2f35cbab2deefbe0a64 3. https://gyazo.com/da6606ba2eb37743c14b793b253216e9 4. https://gyazo.com/9ada330db508c67ed1783e28ff35abfc 5. https://gyazo.com/69c59efbf2259744e9cdb2533723a917
@zepdrix @SolomonZelman @IrishBoy123 @Zarkon
Quite lost on what to do for 5.
Will probably post that one separately.
start with \(a(t) = 40 \) so \(v(t) = \int dt \; a(t) = 40t + \alpha\) you also have \(v(0) = -20\) so \(\alpha = ????\) just follow the clues that way.....
Ok, let me give it a go. Were you able to look at my other problems to see if I was on the right track?
is \[\alpha \] supposed to be C?
it's a constant
@IrishBoy123 I can't seem to get it, I am stuck at \[v(0)=-80+\alpha \]
What would I input for v(0) to solve? 10?
@PeterPan
That sure is a lot ^^ Are you like... in college already? haha
I wish, all this because me and my calc teacher got into an argument so he failed me. Now I gotta do it online :( then another time in college.
I'd have an easier time at this if we go at it one at a time... Just for clarification, which problem are we currently working on? ^^
Let's start with the first.
Here goes nothing... It seems the integral is a simple \[\Large \int_0^4\sin^{-1}\left(\frac{x}{4}\right)dx\] And this much, you got, it seems... Sorry if I'm starting over, I'm also not good at continuing someone else's solution, it puts me off-rhythm, you know how it is ^^
That's fine
For simplicity, you used substitution, letting \(\large m=\frac x4\) so that \(\large dm = \frac14dx\)
Yes, then I used integration by parts to integrate the function which I checked using wolfram
Can't go wrong with Wolfam :D Were you correct according to it?
Yes
I then plugged in the endpoints and checked my answer using my graphing calculator
Which was right
Your calculator said you were right :D Why defer to me, who's subject to human error? HAHA
I honestly just wanted to check my methods since I know the work should be fine if the method is correct.
LOOL
So we know #1 is right, and we worked out #2 (last post) so all we have left are 3-5
These people can be such sadists -_-
Well, actually, no. #3 is pretty easy. Any idea how to set up the bloody integral? :D
Here. Well, say SOMETHING :D
So sorry, went to use the restroom.
I have already set up the integral in my work. If you didn't see it I can type it out for you.
Please do... if it's not too much trouble D:
Np
\[\int\limits_{0}^{1}(x-x^2)^2dx\]
Then I expanded
\[\int\limits_{0}^{1} x^4-2x^3+x^2dx\]
Took the integral and solved.
And knowing you, solving the actual integral was a no-brainer, yes? :D Time to move on to #4?
Yessir hehe. I'm guessing I set it up correctly?
What? #3? Yes.
Yay! :)
Alright #4.
As for #4, you'll have to tell me what the Mean Value Theorem for Integrals is in this case... there are two of them.
There is?
I wasn't given a case :(
Unless I'm supposed to figure that out
Cause I didn't, all I did was find slope and then set it equal to the derivative to solve for x
Well, that seems to be the normal Mean Value Theorem... as in, the one involving derivatives :D But we need the Mean Value Theorem for Integrals here...
Anyway, yes, the mean value theorem for integrals does apply, now, why don't you start by integrating the function from -1 to 1? ^^
For your perusal: http://www.mathwords.com/m/mean_value_theorem_integrals.htm
Should I erase what I had previously done?
Or does it apply in some way?
I didn't see what you had previously done D:
I'm sorry T.T I don't have enough attention span to look through notes D: That's why I never took any haha
I never took any either
But let me write it out
I found slope
oh, slope? slope has nothing to do with this :D
\[\frac{ f(1)-f(-1)}{ 1+1}\]
Oh ok then
I'll start erasing :(
Integrate the function from -1 to 1 and what do you get?
I got 0
Site just lagged for me
Me too. It happens. Okay, great ^^ The MVT for integrals says that for any continuous function, on an integral I, there is a point c in I such that f(c) = the integral. So... what value/s from [-1 , 1] give 0 when you run them through f(x)?
Just solve for f(x) = 0 for the solutions that lie within [-1 , 1]
Site keeps glitching on me :( I'm doing that now.
I got x=0,4,-4 only one in the interval is 0
So final answer is x=0
Yup ^^
Great. Now last one.
Seems pretty straightforward to me :)
I tried following IrishBoy123's steps but I can't seem to get it.
I can't seem to solve for C
Then let's start over
\[\int\limits_{}^{} 40dt\]
With you so far... the answer should be 40t + C
\[= 40t\]
Yup
+C****
So... initial velocity is -20 It means when t = 0, the whole velocity should be -20. 40(0) + C = -20 Solve it... lol
Ohhhhhhhh I'm an idiot.
I'm Kurt :>
This is what I did \[v(0)=40(-20)+C\]
lol
Hi Kurt
That's how we learn :D
Okay, so I'm sure you've realised as I have that the velocity at time t would be 40t - 20 Now integrate this again.
Trial and error is the best way.
Got it? :D
\[20t^2-20t+C\]
Now solve for C again? Using initial position?
Yup :) Gotten the hang of it, I see...
Hell yeah I did
Final answer is 10?
Finish it ^^
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!