Ask your own question, for FREE!
History 7 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Pleaseee help! You are a judge that is trying a murder case. Up until this point there has been only one suspect (Suspect A), but new evidence and information show that more than one person was involved in the murder. The evidence shows that this second suspect (Suspect B) may have been the one to pull the trigger and commit the heinous crime of murder. How does this new evidence affect Suspect A?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The new evidence is considered mitigating circumstances and may reduce the blameworthiness of the Suspect B. The new evidence is considered aggravating circumstances and may increase the blameworthiness of the Suspect A. The new evidence is considered aggravating circumstances and may reduce the blameworthiness of Suspect A. The new evidence is considered mitigating circumstances and may reduce the blameworthiness of the Suspect A.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The fourth one. The new evidence is considered mitigating circumstances and may reduce the blameworthiness of the Suspect A. This is because mitigating circumstances only reduce the severity of the crime.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thanks

OpenStudy (anonymous):

can you help me with this one In July of 2004, Sherelee Purnell of Salisbury, Maryland, pulled away from the Tiger Mart gas station without paying for the 2.78 gallons of fuel she pumped into her car. The court decided to give her a(n) _________________ sentence where she was ordered to walk along the street in front of the Tiger Mart gas station wearing a sign that declared the crime she committed.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No problem. Aggravating circumstances are the opposite where the severity of the crime is increased due to their factors. This might be assault with a weapon.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yeah, could you help with that one ? These are the choices indeterminate alternate determinate mandatory

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes just one second.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

kay

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It would be alternate.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thanks

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No problem. Alternate sentence basically means consequences that is not prison.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

*are not

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh okay lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Do you know what constitutional sentencing is ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Are there answer choices?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

no this is the question , Julia has served one year of her 10-year sentence in prison. She has behaved herself, works at the library, and has not acted out in any way. She is hoping that at her next hearing the judge will reduce her sentence. What type of sentence is Julia hoping the judge will grant her?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

and the choices are mandatory sentencing alternative sentencing determinate sentencing constitutional sentencing

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes it is constitutional sentencing as the other ones do not make sense.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That's what i thought. Just wanted to make sure. Thank youu

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No problem.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!