You are dealt two playing cards from a standard deck (without replacement). What is the probability that one of the cards is the 4 of diamonds?
I \(\heartsuit \) probability.
\[\boxed{\color{red}{4\diamond}}\]
P(the first card is four of diamonds) = 1/52. P(the second card is four of diamonds) = 51/52 * 1/51 Add both.
I get 2/52
Good.
|dw:1451392732510:dw|
yes, I think you can think of it like this. Is 1/26 right though?
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1+-+%2851+choose+2%29+%2F+%2852+choose+2%29
This was my first thought,
1-51/52*50/51 = 1 - 50/52 = 2/52
hmm ok, i guess it really was that easy
i've been studying too much QM, no quantum interference here
If instead there is replacement, the probability is greater right? 1/52 + 51/52 * 1/52 + 1/52*1/52 = 2/52 + 1/52^2 > 2/52
w/ replacement shouldn't it be simply http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1+-+%2851%2F52%29%5E2
P("at least one time 4diamond") = 1 - P("no time 4diamond")
but 1/26 = 0.03846 > 0.03809
Now that looks very interesting...
what formulae are we using here?
The probability of getting it with replacement should obviously be lower, no?
hmm, it's not so obvious
Why is is less?
One more card in the deck makes it harder to get the intended one.
what if the replacement card itself is the intended one ?
but that is only one case compared to the fifty-one others.
1/52+1/51
The chance of getting 4 of diamonds twice, is relatively insignificant.
`If instead there is replacement, the probability is greater right?` 1/52*51/52 + 51/52*1/52 + 1/52*1/52 = (2*51+1)/52^2
ah @ganeshie8, that's it and the previous case was 1/52 + 1/52 = 2*52/52^2 comparing numerators 2*52 > 2*51+1
oh so was I wrong
I understand it better now, thanks to all
you were not wrong at all @ParthKohli
1/26 = 2*52/52^2
yes, got it
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!