Find Maclaurin Series for function y: lny = xy
hi!
Ikram :D
Maclaurin series is just a special type of Taylor series, which is the null case case of Taylor about x=0. Do you know how to construct Taylor series of the given function ?
I know how to construct Taylor for any function but this. I have the function in both sides.
oh, you don't know how to make Taylor for f(x,y) function ?
Yeah.
know that ln y=xy f(x,y)=xy-ln y
@ikram002p , Isn't the question asking for the expansion for function y ? and lny = xy ? lny - xy = 0 ? if we got that , we got the expansion for the 2 variables.
yes my bad! but the thing is its not separable hmmm lets think of another way
@TrojanPoem know it does not important... id we separate it or not lets do it on the casual way
ikram002p know that ln y=xy f(x,y)=xy-ln y Trojo: The above makes sense to me, but for two reasons I can't be of any significant help right now: 1) Never tired finding a Mac series for a fun. of two variables and (2) have just finished a marathon session with another student and my head is swimming. Glad to hear from you, tho'.
@ikram002p , Do you know about something like this ? y = e^(xy) y' = e^(xy) * [ xy' + y] e^xy * xy' + e^(xy) y = y' y' ( 1- e^(xy)) = e^(xy)*y y' = e^(xy)*y/(1-e^(xy)) ? Then x = 0 lny = 0 lny = ln 1 y = 1 y' = e^(0) * 1 / (1-e^0) = 1 * 1/(1-1) = 1/0 Check my calculations.
@ikram002p , I mean do you think of
so as it asked for y only i think we can do this y'=y^2/1-xy y''=..... ect
I agree to ur solution, there is no harm for doing that!
BUT if it asked u to write a series with both of x,y then that solution is not valid.
It asks for the expansion of function y. I didn't take the 2 variables expansion yet.
We had better remember that y > 0, before doing that.
@ikram002p , By the way, How did you get this nice derivative ? mine is nasty.
would that make a problem @tkhunny ? x_0 of the condition have no strict AND it can be 0.
...and we haven't really lost that when writing y = e^(xy). I just want to keep track of it explicitly. We sometimes wander off and forget that the solution is limited to the open half-plane.
@TrojanPoem i'm lazy http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28ln+y%3Dxy%29+first++derivative+ but y>0 has nothing with it , ln y=x+y when x=0 then ln y=y solve that we would get a complex constant which is not important as u haven't studies 2 variables yet.
studied**
i suggest that you write the formula first ... and then lets see
f(x) = f(0) f'(0)x + [ f''(0)x^2 ]/2! +.....
Still can't find how it got that cool derivative.
@ikram002p , what's f(x) here ? It used to be simple f(x) = e^x so e^x = ... the expansion
hint ln y= x+y (ln y)' =(x+y)' 1/y y' =x'+y'
well y itself ...
@ikram002p Sorry for dumbness how did you get it ? lny = x+ y?
why they teasing u kids with such problems xD
wait pardon lny=xy 1/y y'=x'y+xy'
@ikram002p , My prof doesn't like seeing grade A^+ , A ... till K
Ok , y'/y = xy' + y y' = xyy' + y^2
@TrojanPoem focus (ln y)'=(xy)' (1/y) y' =xy'+y y'({1/y}-x)=y y'(1-x/y)=y y'=y^2/1-xy
@ikram002p , I got it first :P
well i just broke my phone cause of this question :P
Trololo.
What's f(x) here ? xD
y only :P (what ever it is)
Ok another stupid question ? f(0) = ?
As a eighth grader, I have no clue what this is
I don't know what's the problem with the cute sinx expansion.
XD
:D
@ikram002p , what is f(0) ? OK you don't have to say it : focus.
ln y= xy ln y=0y ln y=0 so y=1
at first i said ln y=x+y AS i made a typo. sorry!
@ikram002p, Never mind. Thanks a lot. I think that way the question is done.
yw =)
If it has nothing to do with "y > 0", you have created an extension of the problem. That's fine, you just need to know that.
=) everyone knows that
pretty trivial
Disagree. Domain is never trivial. Of course, over the years, I have come to understand that I seem to care more than most others about Domain issues.
i'm just trolling you @tkhunny i understand ur point. but being sarcasm is one of my way :P *Pardon*
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!