A sandbag was thrown downward from a building. The function f(t) = -16t2 - 32t + 128 shows the height f(t), in feet, of the sandbag after t seconds. Part B: Complete the square of the expression for f(x) to determine the vertex of the graph of f(x). Would this be a maximum or minimum on the graph? Part C: Use your answer in part B to determine the axis of symmetry for f(x)?
@mathmale @mathstudent55 @satellite73 @triciaal @ganeshie8 @sleepyjess
you do not (repeat do NOT) need to complete the square to do this
How do you complete a square?
the first coordinate of the vertex of \(y=ax^2+bx+c\) is always \[x=-\frac{b}{2a}\]
@satellite73 Perhaps, but the question is asking me to complete the square nonetheless.
the second coordinate is what you get when you replace \(x\) by the first coordinate
in your case \(a=-16,b=-32\)
And I already know how to calculate the vertex, thanks! But how do I complete a square @satellite73 ? (This is unrelated, but how did you get a 100 smartscore, and are you the only person to ever get a 100 smartscore?)
ok first off lets note that the question makes no sense at all physically, since \(t\) represents time, and the first coordinate of the vertex is going to be negative so unless you can go backwards in time, (which you cannot) the question is meaningless
Yeah, I pointed that out in Part A
But anyways, how do you complete a square?
Theoretically you could go "forward in time" by using a black hole's gravitational pull, but that's unrelated.
think about this: you throw a rock DOWN from an initial height, and you want to know the maximum height pretty clearly the max is where you started from
Yeah I get it, the question doesn't make much sense. But how do you complete a square anyways?
if you still want to complete the square, we can do it
Yes please
first off, factor out the \(-16\) from the first two terms what do you get ?
You can factor out -16 from all 3 terms, shouldn't I do that?
no
k f(t) = -16(t2 - 2t) + 128
ok so we are at \[f(t)=-16(t^2-2t)+128\]now to complete the square, what is half of \(-2\)?
-1?
yes
and \((-1)^2=?\)
-1?
no
oh wait, sorry. 1
eys
yes
got it
ok that was wrong, let me back up
we got \((-1)^2=1\) right?
wait, it was 2t, where did the t go?
lets ignore the \(-16\) for the moment, and concentrate only on \(t^2-2t\)
right
but how did you make the t go away?
half of \(-2\) is \(-1\) so we are going to complete the square by writing \((t-1)^2\)
now the \(t\) did not go away, because \[(t-1)^2=t^2-2t+1\] right?
but something has changed we started with \[t^2-2t\] and ended with \[t^2-2t+1\] so we completed the square by adding \(1\)
I dont really get it...
when you complete the square, you are making a change to write it as a perfect square
(t−1)2=t2−2t+1
we have to compensate for that change
oh, because you divided 2 in half, so you added 1 somewhere else?
right, add or subtract as the case may be
got it
now is where it gets a little complicated so lets go slow
k
we have \[-16(t^2-2t)+128\] and we write the first term as a perfect square as \[-16(t-1)^2+128\pm?\]
alright
now the first term is a perfect square, but we have to figure out what change we made so we can compensate for it
and compensate for it next to 128?
right
got it
i think we only took away 1. That's the only change i think, correct?
yes, but we actually have to worry about the \(-16\) in front
oh
we have also made a mistake i see, so lets correct it first
wheres the mistake?
\[-16t^2-32t+128=-16(t^2+2t)+128\]
i don't see any mistake
the process is still the same, half of 2 is 1, one squared is 1
we had \(-2t\) when it should have been \(+2t\)
oh yeah
so now we are at \[-16(t+1)^2+128\pm?\]
why is it 128 +-?
now we didn't really add 1, because of that \(-16\) out fron
that is what we are going to correct
we have to figure out what we added or subtracted so we can compensate for it
wait, how did we not really add 1. Okay, this is the most complicated math problem i've ever had
gaah
How does that -16 affect us not actually adding a 1
it looks like we added one (don't fret, i am going to show you a real snap way to do this )
I'm confused :(
\[-16(t+1)^2=-16(t^2+2t+1)=-16t^2-32t-16\]
is that part clear ?
It might help if you reversed the order, but yeah, I think i get that part
ok so we actually did not add one, the -16 out front means we SUBTRACTED 16
...
you see it right? the \(-16\) out at the end there
my expression isn't too far off from my profile pic right now
cause I really have no idea what you just said, or how you got to that answer @satellite73
(This is unrelated, but how did you get a 100 smartscore, and are you the only person to ever get a 100 smartscore?)
\[-16(t+1)^2=-16(t^2+2t+1)=-16t^2-32t\color{red}{-16}\]
you do see it right? it is red
yeah, i see the -16, but how does that mean we never added a 1?
we added 1 to complete the square, but because of the -16 out front we really subtracted 16
so we have to add it back
WAIT HOLD ON
\[-16t^2-32t+128=-16(t+1)^2+128+16\] that equal sign is for real
how does it mean you actually subtracted 16? I really don't get this
Ya know, I might be able to complete this question by saying you don't need to find the square to find the vertex...
we changed \(t^2+2t\) in to \((t+1)^2\) by adding 1 right, because \((t+1)^2=t^2+2t+1\) is that clear or no?
yes
And then you would compensate by adding 1 somewhere else
yes, if that was all we had, that is what we would do (subtract 1 to compensate, not add)
we add one, we have to subtract one
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!