Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
@Anaise
OpenStudy (anaise):
Is that spelled correctly ?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
yeah
OpenStudy (anonymous):
yeah
OpenStudy (anaise):
Do you have anything down?
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anaise):
written*
OpenStudy (anonymous):
no idk how to do it
OpenStudy (anonymous):
@DanJS
OpenStudy (tommynaut):
Perhaps the answer is "all sips are bips". This doesn't look quite like maths though; logic and maths are related but not the same.
OpenStudy (anonymous):
huh
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (boldjon):
is there like any numbers that come with it?
OpenStudy (hossamhoussien):
I think Tommynaut is right because" De Morgan" law says that negation of a negation is confirming
OpenStudy (zarkon):
the negation of " no sips are bips" is NOT " all sips are bips"
OpenStudy (mathstudent55):
The negation of "no sips are bips" is "not no sips are bips" which means "some bips are sips"
OpenStudy (tommynaut):
Actually yeah, that makes a lot more sense @mathstudent55. I'll delete my answers as they're misleading.
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (amistre64):
the negation of "no person in the room", is not "all persons are in the room".
in order to make the statement false (negate it) of no person false ... there has to be at least how many people in the room?