Solid circular disk of radius (0.5 m) rotates around its center of mass under effect of tangential force (F) resulted from pulling a robe coiled around the disk. The angular displacement is given according to the following relation: θ(t)=5t^3+8t^2+4t+10 Given that the torque effecting the disk at t = 2s is 11.4 N.m Find the following: A) Mass of the disk : (Ok) a) 1.2 kg b) 0.15 kg c) 0.3kg d) 0.78 kg B) The force (F) at t = 3s: a)15.9 N b) 31.8 N c) 63.6 N d) 35 N C) Average angular acceleration during t = 4, t =0 D) Length of pulled robe during t = 4, t= 0:
I manged to solve the rest, but got different answers than the aimed. ( in choices, but not correct).
for which q u didn't get the answer?
B, C, D :(
first B
how can u relate torque and force?
M = 1.2 kg
I got the force as a function of time. and let t = 3 s
\[\theta (t) = 5t^{3} + 8 t^{2} + 4t + 10\]
i was about to ask that
My bad.
u got the force as a function of time?
I did.
then what is the problem?
My answer differs from the book.
Write your solution and then we can compare it to mine.
sorry i m not sure..pls check with someone else
@dan815
well..did u differentiate theta to find the angular acceleration and find it 2s?
yeah
then did u divide by r ?
to get the linear acceleration..??
\[\theta (t) = 5t^3 + 8t^2 + 4t +10\] \[\omega (t) = 15t^2 + 16t +4\] \[\omega ' (t) = 30t + 16\] \[F = ma_{t}\] \[a_{t} = \omega r \] \[F = mr \omega = 0.6 (30t + 16) = 18t+ 9.6\] \[F(t) = 18t + 9.6\]
\[F(3) = 18 * 3 + 9.6 = 63.6 N\]
Included in the choices, but not the correct answer.
even i did the same way..so i think ur answer is right
but i took the mass u gave is that correct?
??
Check yourself.
The book has full solution, not just final answer.
I recalculated all his steps and he keep getting 31.8 N which is 0.5 F(3) mine.
umm what ddid u get for the mass?
1.2 kg
ya i checked it..its 1.2kg
where has the book deviated from the above steps?
Book solution for (B): \[\tau = Fr\] \[\tau = I \omega '\] \[\omega ' (3) = 30(3) + 16 = 106 rad/s^2\] \[\tau (3) = 0.15 * 106 = 15.9 N.m\] \[F = \frac{ \tau }{ r } = \frac{ 15.9 }{ 0.5 } = 31.8 N\]
oh ur off by a factor of 2 hmm
or r^2
if it was F = mr^2 omega
hey u have substituted w' in place of w
Typo it must be a = w' r F = w' mr
oh ya..
but does this condition hold true always?
\[s = \theta r \] \[\frac{ d }{ dt }\] \[v = \omega r\] \[\frac{ d }{ dt }\] \[a_{t} = \omega ' r\]
In the proof, only r (the radius) was constant. and it is.
No i am asking like..only in pure rolling a=w'/r is valid right?
Nah, it always hold true. as |dw:1452689139119:dw| S = arc length θ = angular displacement r = raduis S = θr
the one of pure rolling you're talking about is M = a_{r} * N ?
Later in the question, it was used to find D
i didn't get ur notation..a_{r}??
\[M = a_{r} N\]
what does N stand for?
Normal force.
Reaction of the surface upon a circular tire.
ok and M?
The moment rotating the body.
its seems as though both methods are correct...but the answers come out to be different.. if i get any idea i'll tell u
This is a rotational dynamics question with non-uniform angular acceleration. Check my working!
@Farcher , Nice, your steps are totally correct. Can you spot the mistake in my own solution ?
ya @Farcher great job! but why can't we do \[a=\alpha*r\] ?
eventhough the acceleration is non-uniform we are finding its value only at a particular instant..right?
a = alpha r is correct but it is not constant acceleration.
Well, I found the force as a function of time, the solution is above check it.
Then\[\tau = I_c \alpha \Rightarrow Fr = \frac 1 2 m r^2 \alpha \Rightarrow F = \ \frac 12 m a\]
Nice proof, but why isn't the force F = ma as usual ?
i think Farcher is right..here we can't straight away apply F=ma coz the object is under rotational motion..inertia is the rotational equivalent of mass
Because it is not a point mass. It is a disc which is a lot of point masses distributed over a volume. There must actually be another equal and opposite force acting at the axle so that the disc just undergoes rotation and its centre of mas does not move.
Thanks for the explanation..
I now got it , F = ma , resultant of forces = ma ( newton law) i used it as the sole force.
Thanks Farcher.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!