Evaluating an integral.
\[I=\int\limits_{0}^{\pi/2}(\frac{ 1 }{ 1+\tan^{6,000}\theta})d(\theta)\] and \[J=\int\limits_{0}^{\pi/2}(\frac{ 1 }{ 1+\cot^{6,000} \theta})d(\theta)\] 1) Evaluate limits 2)Show J = I 2) what is J+I?
f(x)=f(a-x) when limits are from 0 toa..u know this?
emm no, I didn't know o.0
\[\int\limits_{0}^{a} f(x) = \int\limits_{0}^{a}f(a-x)\]
using this u can easily prove 2)
hmm haha you'd have to show me. is f(x) = I ?
here a=pi/2 and we know tan(pi/2-θ)=cot θ..now u get it?
no not really ...how do we know the value for theta?
we needn't know it..just apply the above two properties and u will see J=I
\[\int\limits_{0}^{\pi/2} 1/(1+\tan ^{6000}((\pi/2)-θ))\] =??
hint: use tan to cot conversion that i have mentioned above
...there are you evaluating at the end points?
tan(pi/2-θ)=cot θ how do we know this?
its a formula (TRIG. CONVERSIONS)
ok?got it?
how did you plug pi/2 into that integral?
what does it mean when they "evaluate limits"?
I think to solve them.
solve what limits?
I mean do they mean integrals?
She was doing limit definition for integration earlier... maybe that's what they're going on about.. I dunno
part 2 and 3 make sense but I have no clue what part 1 means
oh sorry!! typo. I meant integrals xD
I think we can easily find part 1 by first looking at part 2 and 3
have you did part 2 yet?
@priyab2 said something about using a co-function identity and doing a substitution for part 2 which does work very awesomely
ya fun stuff :)
\[\int\limits_0^\frac{\pi}{2} \frac{1}{1+(\cot(\theta))^{6000} } d \theta \\ \cot(\theta)=\tan(\frac{\pi}{2}-\theta) \text{ is a co-function identity } \\ \int\limits_0^\frac{\pi}{2} \frac{1}{1+(\tan(\frac{\pi}{2}-\theta))^{6000}} d \theta \\ \text{ use a substitution on the } \frac{\pi}{2}-\theta \text{ part }\]
Yeah, I got part 2:)
so we have I=J then if you can find I+J then you can easily find I and J separately which would be part 1
big hint for part 3 just add the integrals as they were
find a common denominator and combine fractions
you will see something really cool happen
add them as they were before the u sub?
their original forms?
yep
hmm would it be easier to do that after evaluating?
no you don't want to evaluate the integrals
force a common denominator \[\frac{a}{b}+\frac{c}{d}=\frac{ad+cb}{db}\]
\[\frac{1}{1+\tan^{6000}(\theta)}+\frac{1}{1+\cot^{6000}(\theta)}=?\]
\[\frac{ (1+cot^{6000}(theta))+(1+tan^{6000}(theta)) }{ (1+\tan^{6000}\theta)(1+\cot^{6000}(\theta) }\]..?
okay multiply the bottom out...
you do know that tan(x)*cot(x)=1 on tan(x)*cot(x)'s domain right?
\[\tan(x)\cot(x)=1 \\ \text{ so } (\tan(x)\cot(x))^n=1^n \\ \text{ gives } \tan^n(x) \cot^n(x)=1\]
k just a sec, i'm writing it all out haha
man these ^6000 are messing me up. I am quite disoriented.
I know it's like a normal ^n haha but still D:
(1+tan^n(theta))*(1+cot^n(theta)) I would just foil it out, yeah?
\[(1+\tan^n(x))(1+\cot^n(x)) \\ 1(1+\cot^n(x))+\tan^n(x)(1+\cot^n(x)) \\ =...\] distribute
yeah you can use that thing that is called foil
(tan^n)(cot^n) = 1?
yes
well tan^n(x)*cot^n(x)=1 yes
so we'd just end up with 1+tan^(6000)(theta)+1+cot^(6000)(theta)
and what do we have on the numerator ?
(1+cot^(6000)(theta))*(1+tan^(6000)(theta))
:(
should be + not *
oh I guess I should simplify that one too
oops, that's what I meant :}
so if you have the same thing on top and bottom...
0.0 it..does it equal 1?
\[I+J=\int\limits_0^\frac{\pi}{2} 1 d \theta \]
mind..blown. thoroughly.
you got it from here right?
now I evaluate at end points
you integrate 1 and yes plug in the endpoints
which just = pi/2
\[I+J=\frac{\pi}{2} \\ I=J \\ \text{ so } I+I=\frac{\pi}{2} \implies I=?\]
I = (pi/2)-I ?
I+I=2I :p
then you solve for I
come on I know your algebra solving skills are better than that :p
you solved equations like x+x=5 or something like that right?
x+x=5 2x=5 and so x=5/2 similarly you can solve I+I=pi/2
hahah #braindead. pi/4 yeah?
yeah and since I=J then J is also pi/4
so you have found what both definite integrals equal now
and that solves part 1? :o
yes it is weird they put that as part 1 in my opinion
wow that was quite glorious.
probably for the students to spend forever trying to evaluate it in it's original form xD which I tried haha
unless that was suppose to be the main question and they were using the other questions to lead you there
you can easily show that one co-function identity you weren't convinced was an identity if you want me to show you
|dw:1452834279676:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!