Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 16 Online
OpenStudy (astrophysics):

How do you take factorials of a fraction?

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

\[\left( \frac{ 1 }{ 2 } \right)!, \left( \frac{ 3 }{ 2 } \right)!\] etc @ganeshie8 Trying to understand this for gamma functions haha

OpenStudy (solomonzelman):

\(\color{#000000 }{ \displaystyle \Gamma (x)=\int\limits_{0}^{\infty}z^{x-1}e^{-z}~dz }\) If I recall correctly, and then you can express the integral as a power series, and use partial sums to evaluate.

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Do you know Euler reflection formula ?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

\[\Gamma(1-z)\Gamma(z) = \dfrac{\pi}{\sin(\pi z)}\] for \(0\lt z\lt 1\)

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

plugin \(z=\frac{1}{2}\)

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

That's right, but I'm not sure how to take factorials of fractions, that's the part I'm not entirely sure about. \[\Gamma (n) = (n-1)!\]

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Ooh interesting

OpenStudy (anonymous):

correct me if i am wrong, but isn't \(\Gamma(n)=(n-1)!\) ?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

right, euler reflection formula and the definition of factorial as recurrence relation allow you to compute the value of factorual of any fraction

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

I'm still not sure how that helps

OpenStudy (anonymous):

and \[\Gamma(\frac{1}{2})\] is something goofy like \(\sqrt{\pi}\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that is about all i remember

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

\[\Gamma (3/2) = (3/2-1)! = 1/2! = ?\]

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%281%2F2%29%21 how

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

I mean is there a way to do that without integrating

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

recurrence relation gives you \[\Gamma(x+1) = x\Gamma(x) \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i guess we could try to compute the integral \[\int_0^{\infty}x^{-\frac{1}{2}}e^{-x}dx\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

without doing it my guess is parts, but i could be way off

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

\[\Gamma(\frac{3}{2}) = \Gamma(\frac{1}{2}+1) =\frac{1}{2}\Gamma(\frac{1}{2}) \]

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

You can find the value of \(\Gamma(\frac{1}{2})\) using euler reflection formula easily

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

\[\Gamma(1-z)\Gamma(z) = \dfrac{\pi}{\sin(\pi z)}\] plugin \(z=\frac{1}{2}\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok then what?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh nvm

OpenStudy (anonymous):

has a fit of stupidity there, yes, that works nicely for \(\frac{1}{2}\)

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

\[(\frac{1}{2})! =(\frac{3}{2}-1)! = \Gamma(\frac{3}{2}) = \Gamma(\frac{1}{2}+1) =\frac{1}{2}\Gamma(\frac{1}{2}) \]

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

With the integral I guess we can use \[\int\limits_{0}^{\infty} x^n e^{-ax} dx = \frac{ n! }{ a^{n+1} }\]

rvc (rvc):

got that link through bibby

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yeah but that is just begging the question because your numerator still has a factorial in it

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Ooh ok I see what you did ganeshie

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Thanks :P

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Above works only when you can reduce a fraction down to \(\frac{1}{2}\) using the recurrence relation

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Yup I see, \[\Gamma (1/2) = \sqrt{\pi}\] is the only one I see in my formulae sheet, so is that the only one defined?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

For example, you can't find \(\Gamma(1/3)\) using just the above two goodies

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Yeah you can find the gamma value of all half integers using above recurrence relation

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Ah gotcha, good stuff! Thank you

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

See if you can you find a formula for \(\Gamma(\frac{n}{2})\)

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

\(n\in \mathbb{Z^+}\)

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

That seems tricky, I'll try

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

\[\Gamma(\frac{n}{2}) =(\frac{n}{2}-1)\Gamma(\frac{n}{2}-1) \]

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Yeah haha, I was just going to ask you that, if I could start with \[\Gamma(\frac{ n }{ 2 }) =(\frac{ n }{ 2 }-1)!\] sort of deal

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

We use the symbol \(!\) only for integers use \(\Gamma\) for reals

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Ah ok, I've never used gamma functions before I don't think until QM

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

I actually needed to know how to use this for here haha |dw:1453005957021:dw|

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Let \(ax^2 = u \\\implies 2axdx = du \\\implies dx =\dfrac{du}{2a \sqrt{u/a}} \)

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

\[\color{#000000 }{ \displaystyle \Gamma (x)=\int\limits\limits_{0}^{\infty}z^{x-1}e^{-z}~dz } \]

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Nice!

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

the integral then becomes \[\int\limits_0^{\infty} (\sqrt{u/a})^me^{-u} \dfrac{du}{2a\sqrt{u/a}}\\~\\=\frac{1}{2a^{(m+1)/2}}\int\limits_0^{\infty} u^{(m-1)/2}e^{-u}du\\~\\ =\frac{1}{2a^{(m+1)/2}}\int\limits_0^{\infty} u^{\color{red}{(m+1)/2}-1}e^{-u}du\\~\\ \] Compare that integeral with the gamma integral

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Haha, now I know how they got that formula, that seems super simple..in hindsight

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

are you also working with beta function ?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

there is a nice relation between gamma and beta functions

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

\[\beta(a,b) = \dfrac{\Gamma(a)\Gamma(b)}{\Gamma(a+b)}\]

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Nope, we're really not even taught these gamma functions, but rather given a formula sheet with bunch of integrals on them...that's physics for you! Formulas, no need to prove

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

That is not physics, that is more like engineering. Physicists do care for proofs. Only dumb engineers look for formulas w/o proofs ;)

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Haha, well yeah I guess I should've clarified, it's not that there is no need to prove, I suppose they assume you already know the proof at least in quantum mechanics!

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

It's weird...like these guassian integrals, it's so different from classical mechanics, all about probability

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

These special functions are not so hard. They are defined using definite integrals and if you're in QM, the definition is all you care for, I guess..

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

I still like the proofs though, but these are handy only because otherwise each problem will take like 10 years to do without them

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

Like check this integral out, what in the world |dw:1453007568253:dw|

OpenStudy (astrophysics):

I don't like to mindlessly use these integrals, but sometimes I think it's pretty important haha.

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

That integral is easy if you're familiar with the beta function

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

But I feel that you wont learn anything by evaluating that integral on your own. It's just algebra and you will get tired for sure. Better to use the result directly :)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!