http://prntscr.com/9rcl4u
@robby8974
I would recommend rewriting the inside as t^-4 just for simplicity
−1/3x^6+1/192
But you should explain where that comes from
all you do is integrate using the power rule
But she may not know that so it's best to explain with words what you did
i know you integrate. so because it's asking for F'(x), you don't find the original equation of F(x) because that is the derivative, am i correct?
if you put it into www.mathway.com you will find out that i am right (i used it to check my work)
and yes you are right
but first what are the answer choices
there is no answer choices
you're just plugging in x^2 and 4 into t right?
yes
Yes Amy, this is an application of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part 1 Since your upper limit is more than just x, you'll have to chain rule. So you'll get a lil bit more than just plugging x in :)
do the chain rule for (x^2)^4?
yes
\[\large\rm F(x)=\int\limits_c^x g(t)dt\]Then FTC, Part 1 tells us:\[\large\rm F'(x)=g(x)\]You're integrating, then differentiating. These two things undo one another. All that changes is the argument of the function. So instead of t, you have x for the argument of your function. But when we have something like this:\[\large\rm F(x)=\int\limits_c^{x^2}g(t)dt\]Now, when we take our derivative, we'll have to chain rule because the inner function is x^2.\[\large\rm F'(x)=g(x^2)\cdot (x^2)'\]
So no, not chain rule for that entire thing, only the x^2, the inner function.
Confused? :o Too much?
so take the chain rule like in differential cal? like y'=x^2=2x
Yes, here is the long way using FTC, Part 2, maybe it will help to see what is going on. \[\large\rm F(x)=\int\limits_4^{x^2} g(t)dt\]Let's call the anti-derivative of g, G for simplicity. Integrating gives us,\[\large\rm F(x)=G(t)|_4^{x^2}\]Evaluating at our limits gives us,\[\large\rm F(x)=G(x^2)-G(4)\]Now we differentiate. Realize that G is going to turn back into little g. But G(4) is just a constant! Will become zero in this process.\[\large\rm F'(x)=g(x^2)(x^2)'-0\]\[\large\rm F'(x)=2x~g(x^2)\]
To answer your question, yes. Sorry if I made that over-complicated :) lol
ok makes sense, so I got 8x^7
alright
Well in this problem: \(\large\rm g(\color{orangered}{t})=\dfrac{1}{\color{orangered}{t}^4}\) So if we end up with:\[\large\rm F'(x)=2x~g(\color{orangered}{x^2})\]I guess we should get something like:\[\large\rm F'(x)=2x\frac{1}{(\color{orangered}{x^2})^4}\]Right?
yes
Which is not 8x^7 +_+
doesn't (x^2)^4=8x^7?
(x^2)^4 = x^8 You don't need to take a derivative again.
oh you're just multiplying it?
|dw:1453061176378:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!