Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 10 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

calculus help. I vive medals

OpenStudy (anonymous):

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@jim_thompson5910

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@Data_LG2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@zepdrix do you think you can help me?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

So if you integrate,\[\large\rm \int\limits_{-3}^0 f'(x)dx\quad=\]Can you handle the next step? What would f'(x) integrate to?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

6

OpenStudy (anonymous):

wait

zepdrix (zepdrix):

I'm not sure if this is the correct approach actually :) But at least it'll get us thinking lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

nvm, 9/2

zepdrix (zepdrix):

9/2, ok great. You must've done that by counting the squares. But let's write the anti-derivative of f'(x) as f(x), yes?\[\large\rm \int\limits\limits_{-3}^0 f'(x)dx\quad=f(x)|_{-3}^0\]Evaluating at the limits,\[\large\rm \int\limits_{-3}^0 f'(x)dx\quad=f(0)-f(-3)\]

zepdrix (zepdrix):

From there we can plug in some information.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok

zepdrix (zepdrix):

As you determined, we can replace the integral with the value 4.5.\[\large\rm 4.5=f(0)-f(-3)\]And they also told us that f(0)=7,\[\large\rm 4.5=7-f(-3)\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

do we just subtract minus 7 and then multiply by negative?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

in that case, I got 2.5

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Yes, that seems like a good idea. That will give us the value of f(-3). Try to think about the process for determining a minimum on an interval. You have to check a few things: ~ Find critical points ~ Then Plug any critical points, AND end points, into the function and compare the outputs. Smallest output = minimum.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

So we have that: f(0) = 7 f(-3)= 2.5 Any critical points in [-3,0] that we should look at? Why or why not? :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

no because if we had critical points, then our value would have been 0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it seems that as you increase x, your value increase. It appears reasonable.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Good, yes. The function is strictly increasing on [-3,0] because the first derivative is positive over that entire interval. So no critical points. Simply compare the end points. Looks like f(-3) gave us the smallest possible value, ya? :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ya

zepdrix (zepdrix):

f(-3) = 2.5 Yayy good job Javier \c:/

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thanks. Would you help with another one? I selected and answer but I am not sure if thats correct

zepdrix (zepdrix):

sure!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

zepdrix (zepdrix):

One sec, lemme upload a small picture so I can write on the graph.

zepdrix (zepdrix):

|dw:1453250863569:dw|

zepdrix (zepdrix):

You have a couple options here: You can take the good student route, and do this the calculus way, looking at slopes and comparing values. Or you can sort of cheat, and realize that they graphed an x^4, x^3 and x^2 type of function. And you know that polynomials decrease in degree when you differentiate them. So whatever function looks like x^4 is your f(x).

zepdrix (zepdrix):

The calculus way is a lot more helpful though, let's see if you can follow along.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

a

zepdrix (zepdrix):

|dw:1453251065384:dw|

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!