Ask your own question, for FREE!
Physics 8 Online
OpenStudy (michele_laino):

Challenge about quantum mechanics

OpenStudy (michele_laino):

starting from this condition: \[\Large \frac{d}{{dt}}{\int_{ - \infty }^{ + \infty } {\left| {\Psi \left( x \right)} \right|} ^2}dx = 0\] please show that the \(Hamiltonian\) operator: \[\Large H \equiv i\hbar \frac{\partial }{{\partial t}}\] is \(hermitian\)

OpenStudy (vincent-lyon.fr):

Doesn't \(\ {\int_{ - \infty }^{ + \infty } {\left| {\Psi \left( x \right)} \right|} ^2}dx=1\) ? so I do not understand the question.

OpenStudy (michele_laino):

hint: we can write this: \[\Large \begin{gathered} 0 = \frac{d}{{dt}}\int_{ - \infty }^{ + \infty } {{{\left| {\Psi \left( x \right)} \right|}^2}} dx = \int_{ - \infty }^{ + \infty } {\frac{{\partial {{\left| {\Psi \left( x \right)} \right|}^2}}}{{\partial t}}} dx = \hfill \\ \hfill \\ = \int_{ - \infty }^{ + \infty } {\frac{{\partial \left( {{\Psi ^*}\Psi } \right)}}{{\partial t}}} dx = ... \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \] now, the \(Schroedinger\) equation, can be useful: \[\Large i\hbar \frac{{\partial \Psi }}{{\partial t}} = H\Psi \] @ganeshie8 @IrishBoy123 @Astrophysics @Empty @BAdhi

OpenStudy (empty):

I had fun thinking about this! I think there was a lot of similarity to that matrix problem we did the other day so this didn't take too long to find! :D $$\frac{d}{dt} \int \Psi^* \Psi dx = 0 $$ $$\int \frac{\partial }{\partial t} (\Psi^* \Psi ) dx = 0$$ $$\int \frac{\partial \Psi^* }{\partial t} \Psi dx +\int \Psi^*\frac{\partial \Psi }{\partial t} dx = 0$$ $$-\int \frac{\partial \Psi^* }{\partial t} \Psi dx =\int \Psi^*\frac{\partial \Psi }{\partial t} dx $$ $$-i \hbar \int \frac{\partial \Psi^* }{\partial t} \Psi dx =i \hbar \int \Psi^*\frac{\partial \Psi }{\partial t} dx $$ $$\left( \int \Psi^* \left(i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \right) \Psi dx \right)^* =\int \Psi^* \left(i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \right) \Psi dx $$ $$\left( \int \Psi^* H \Psi dx \right)^* =\int \Psi^* H \Psi dx $$

OpenStudy (michele_laino):

correct!!! :)

OpenStudy (empty):

I was originally thinking about trying to do something clever with modifying the derivation of this equation, but didn't get very far: \[\frac{d \langle \hat A \rangle}{dt} = \langle [ \hat H, \hat A ] \rangle \] Since commuting with the Hamiltonian implies it's constant over time.

OpenStudy (michele_laino):

your procedure is the only that we can apply to solve this problem nice job! :)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!