Linear algebra, a bit of help with a proof
Question: http://puu.sh/mIJgS/f39b777edf.png the 0 is what kind of gets me, but my idea if we say let A = that set {0, v1,...,vn} and Ax=0 corresponds to a system of p equations and n unknowns. So if n>p then there are more variables than equations so there is a free variable, then Ax=0 has nontrivial solution, and then columns of A are linearly dependent. Also is the set in R^n contains the zero vector, then the set is linearly dependent.
@ganeshie8 @dan815 @Kainui
|dw:1453700319896:dw|
a vector {v1,v2...vn} is linearly independent if a1*v1+a2*v2+an*vn=0
so in ur case linear dependent if the vector is not equal to 0
okay so basically its saying if the solution to Ax=0, contains only the trivial solution of vector x=0
okay so basically its saying if the solution to Ax=0, contains only the trivial solution of vector x=0, then there would be n lin dependant rows or colums for a n by n matrix A
wait so is that what your question is asking?
The way you stated it, doesn't sound the same to me
show that if Ax=0, only has x=0 as trivial solution, where x is a vector, then the rows or colums of A are lin independant
that is the question
What?
It's not talking about linearly independence it's asking me to proof it's linearly DEPENDENT
oh so your question says Ax=0, has a non trivial solution
Yes
wait so thats all there is to your question just that snippet you have there?
if u have a 0 vector in your set, then it has to be dependant
Thats the question, thats it
u can also show this by putting the vectors together in a matrix and Ax=0 will have multiple non trivial solutions in the form <k,0,0,0,0,0,0...,> where k can be anything, if the first row of your A matridx is the 0 vector
Then the way I'm going about it is, let \[A = \left\{ 0, v_1, v_2,..., v_n \right\}\] where A is p x n, and the equation Ax=0 corresponds to a system of p equations and n unknowns, so if n>p then there are more variables than equations so there is a free variable, and we know it will have a nontrivial solution so it's linearly dependant. And also if the set contains the zero vector it's linearly dependant.
and as this dude stated earlier "a vector {v1,v2...vn} is linearly independent if a1*v1+a2*v2+an*vn=0" this is the lin independant statement
yeah this will do : 1*0 + 0*v1 + 0*v2 + .... + 0*vn = 0
Doesn't that prove it's linearly independent though..?
no u have infinite solution
"u can also show this by putting the vectors together in a matrix and Ax=0 will have multiple non trivial solutions in the form <k,0,0,0,0,0,0...,> where k can be anything, if the first row of your A matridx is the 0 vector"
that is a nontrivial linear combination yielding 0 therefore the vectors {0, v1, v2, ... , vn} are linearly "dependent"
finding one non trivial solution is sufficient to prove that the vectors are dependent
Right, I must've read that as something else, it makes sense now
Notice how this relates to the value of the determinant of a matrix
the determinant is 0 when any one line (row or column) contains all 0's
Right
when the determinant of a matrix is NOT 0, the equation Ax = 0 has "only one trivial solution" what is it ?
Linearly indep
im asking about the trivial solution..
im asking about the trivial solution to Ax = 0 when the determinant of A is NOT 0
x + 2y = 0 x - y = 0 the only trivial solution is x = 0, y = 0
Wait what are we talking about here?
the corresponding matrix is \(\begin{bmatrix}1&2\\1&-1\end{bmatrix}\) the column vectors of this matrix are \(v_1=\begin{pmatrix} 1\\1\end{pmatrix}\) and \(v_2=\begin{pmatrix} 2\\-1\end{pmatrix}\) are linearly independent, meaning, the only solution to \(x_1v_1+x_2v_2\) is \(x_1=x_2=0\)
Yes, I know that
If there exists a nontrivial solution, then the vectors are linearly "dependent" so finding any one non trivial solution is sufficient
actually that is the definition of "linearly dependent vectors"
Yeah I know, I misread what you had written at first, I thought you had 0 + 0*v1 + 0*v2 + .... + 0*vn = 0 which is lin. indep. as it's all trivial solutions?
Oh crap the 0 vector
yeah in simple terms : for a nontrivial solution you take "one" zero vector, and "none" other vectors
That's perfect, thank you!
Going back to the determinant, what you were getting across is if I sort of imagine the determinant of a 2x2 matrix as giving the area, if the 2 column vectors are the same then we will have a 0 area, something like that right haha?
Should've said volume and 3x3 that makes more sense but any case I think that is what you were trying to get scross
\(\color{blue}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @rational actually that is the definition of "linearly dependent vectors" \(\color{blue}{\text{End of Quote}}\) Ah so that's what I explained eh haha. This was way simpler than I was thinking, thank you! :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!