Can someone work out a part of a problem for me? ln(1.389)=4726.97 (1/T1 -2.846x10^-3)
@agent0smith @cowgirl1 @ganeshie8 @Rushwr @whpalmer4
I can give the full problem if needed but I can solve the problem until to this point.
Are you needing the full problem?
At what temperature does ethanol boil on a day in the mountains when the barometric pressure is 547 mmHg? The heat of vaporization of ethanol is 39.3 kJ/mol and its normal boiling point is 78.3°C.(R = 8.314J/ K • mol)
@Rushwr In case you needed it.
@Photon336
I can get about half way there then I get stuck.
Boiling happens when the vapor pressure is the same as the external pressure.
Right.
I get that. It's the math I'm having issues with. Bleh.
normal boiling point is at 760 mmHG or 1 atm at 78.3°C
I'll show how far along I can get.
ln(760/547mmHg) =(3.93x10^3 J/mol)/(8.314 J/K*mol) (/T1 - 1/351.3) ln(1.389) = 472.97 (T1 -2.846 x 10^-3)
At this point I get stuck
oh I see \[\ln(\frac{ p }{ p_{0} }) = \frac{ \delta H }{ R }(\frac{ 1 }{ T_{1} }-\frac{ 1 }{ T_{2} })\]
Yeah. Sorry. I'm not good at putting it on here.
You need to solve for T_{2}
i would re-write the equation and solve for T_{2} and then plug in your numbers. YOU should always rewrite the equation first then plug in your values. whenever we have a logarithm where two numbers are divided we can re-write it as shown below. so Ln(x/y) = ln(x)-ln(y) \[Ln(p_2)-Ln(p_{1}) = (\frac{ \delta H }{ R })(\frac{ 1 }{ T_{1} }-\frac{ 1 }{T_{2} })\] our next step is to isolate T_2 The temperature we're looking for. we can divide both sides by delta H/R This is what we get. \[\frac{ R(\ln(p_{2})-\ln(p_{1}) }{ \Delta H } = \frac{ 1 }{ T_{1} }-\frac{ 1 }{ T_{2} }\] now we need to find out what 1/T_{2} is that's the temperature right? so we isolate that by subtracting 1/T1 from both sides. \[\frac{ 1 }{ T_{1} }-\frac{ R(\ln(p_{2})-\ln(p_{1}) }{ \Delta H } = \frac{ 1 }{ T_{2} }\] then you would get 1/T_{2} BUT note that we can take the reciprocal of that and get T_{2} \[\frac{ 1 }{ T_{2} } = (\frac{ 1 }{ T_{2} })^{=1} = T_{2}\]
Can you show how to do it without rewriting the formula? We were not taught to do it that way so it's kinda confusing.
\[\ln (760/547) = 39300/8.314 (1/T1 - 1/351.3)\]
\[\frac{ 1 }{ T_{1} } - \frac{ R(\ln(p2)−\ln(p1)}{ ΔH } = \frac{ 1 }{ T_{2} }\]
\[\ln (1.389) = 4726.97 (\frac{ 1 }{ T1 }-2.846x10^{-3})\]
@staldk3 my point was that so you can just plug in the numbers where the variables are in the end so that you don't get confused. once you've solved for your variable it becomes eaiser
The part above is where I'm lost. I can get to that part at least.
So put everything together first: P_0 = 760 atm T_1 = 351K p_2 = 547 atm T_2 = ? We don't know what T_2 is so we need to solve our equation to find it. That's what I did above. I used to do it the way you did but you can easily get confused. If you solve for the variable you need first you can just plug in all your numbers at the end. which I did here \[\frac{ 1 }{ 351K } - \frac{ 8.314*\ln(547)-\ln(760) }{ 39300 } = (0.0017)^{-1} = 594K\]
But I solved the equation for 1/T2 step by step. the most important thing is to take a look at how I did each step.
Why is it 547 - 760?
And how did it go from (.0017)^-1 to 594K?
remember it's Ln(p2)-Ln(p1) pressure 2 is 560 that's the pressure that we're at right? and pressure 1 is 760 because that's the original pressure
Okay. Right
@staldk3 when we solve this equation we get 1/T2 not T2 that's why we need to take take the recrirpocal. \[(1/T_{2}) = (1/T_{2})^{-1} = T_{2}\]
I see.
So, remember go over my derivation step by step on your own
and then after plug in the numbers.
Alright. I will
you'll find that once you know what you need to solve for FIRST. and you solve the equation for that variable you can easily keep track of what's going on.
Ya. I was doing fine with the other problems like this but for some reason this one tripped me up
it's the math
Yeah.
It's always the math
like the more complicated the formula, you have to do the algebra and manipulations first. if the formula was easier you could just plug in your numbers.
Yeah. I prefer plug and chug.
try going over this again and if you have questions tag me.
Alright. Thanks for the help
Let me reinforce what @Photon336 said: much, much better to rearrange the formula before you plug in your numbers. You are really asking for trouble if you start plugging in numbers first.
i have to admit that is true-I sucked at doing formulas last semester because of that !
yeah @cowgirl1 I used to plug in the numbers first. Until I took gen physics I in college.
yeah I did a one on one with my teacher and she was like no wonder you keep screwing them up...lol...this semester has been much easier
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!