Question

Could someone help me with this question?

Give an example of a statement you think would be easier to prove with coordinate geometry proof, than with a proof method that does not require coordinate geometry. Explain your choice.

I was thinking that maybe it would require something on a coordinate gird of course, and maybe a shape's midpoints being proven another shape? IDK, just help please ;)

Answer 1

@superdavesuper @triciaal

Answer 2

@Michele_Laino

Answer 3

I agree with you because I think it is easier to prove something visually on a coordinate grid than it is mathematically.

Your example of the midpoint of a line is easier to see if the grid is detailed enough, but will not be as accurate as a mathematical result.